×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
Hal N. Beerman
Pro

Hal N. Beerman

Not yet reviewed

One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017

Real Estate Operations, Real Estate Litigation, Construction Law and 4 more

About Hal N. Beerman

Hal N. Beerman is a shareholder in the Real Estate Operations Practice. He focuses his practice on commercial real estate litigation with an emphasis on commercial lease litigation, ownership disputes, construction disputes, party wall issues and mechanic’s liens. Hal also has wide-ranging experience with general commercial litigation in state and federal courts.

Concentrations

•Real estate litigation and arbitration
•Construction disputes and litigation
•Complex commercial litigation
•Premises liability
•Real estate bankruptcy issues and litigation
•Real estate brokerage commission disputers
•Complex commercial litigation
•Appellate practice

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation - Real Estate, 2024-2026
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, New York Metro Super Lawyers, 2023-2025
•'Rising Stars,' 2016-2017
•Team Member, a Law360 'Real Estate Practice Group of the Year,' 2023
•Team Member, U.S. News - Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms Edition, 'Law Firm of the Year,' Real Estate - Litigation, 2017 and 2022
•Team Member, Chambers & Partners USA Real Estate Law Firm of the Year, 2018 and 2022

 

Hal N. Beerman (New York, New York) View website

Reviews for Hal

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Real Estate
  • Litigation
  • Other 4
    • Real Estate Operations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Appeals & Legal Issues
    • Arbitration & Mediation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Experience: HWA 555 Owners, LLC v. RGN-San Francisco XXIV, LLC, California Court of Appeal, First District, First Division, No. A163137 (Jan. 31, 2023). Orally argued successfully on appeal of judgment after trial finding that tenant wrongfully terminated $120M commercial lease.
    HWA 555 Owners, LLC v. RGN-San Francisco XXIV, LLC, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-19-580236 (May 11, 2021). Prevailed at trial
    obtained ruling finding that tenant wrongfully terminated $120M commercial lease.
    P62 LLC v. WFP Retail Co. L.P., Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co., Index No. 650649/2018 (judgment entered following bench trial dismissing multimillion-dollar breach of contract claims against client
    awarding judgment on counterclaims).
    Previous Experience: Fordham University School of Law, Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy, 2004-2007
  • Additional Links
    http://www.gtlaw.com/People/BeermanHalN

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Florida
    New York
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Florida Bar Association
    •Member, New York City Bar Association
    •Member, Litigation Committee
    •Member, Queens County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Fordham University School of Law
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    Journal of Corporate and Financial Law

    Fordham University School of Law
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    2002 Associate editor
    Other Education
    Tufts University
    B.A.
    Varsity Golf Team

    Tufts University
    B.A.
    1999 Member

    President, Student Bar Association, 2001-2002

    Recipient, Dean's Special Achievement Award for the singular and distinctive contribution to the Fordham University School of Law's community, 2002

    Recipient, Archibald R. Murray Award for Public Service
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1977
    New York, N.Y., 1977

Email Hal N. Beerman

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Hal N. Beerman is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Hal N. Beerman attended Fordham University School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions