×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo
Pro

Cameran Michelle Gilliam

Not yet reviewed

28 Bridgeside Blvd., Mount Pleasant, SC 29464

Consumer Fraud Protection and Securities Class Actions

About Cameran Michelle Gilliam

Cameran Gilliam represents clients in complex litigation including securities fraud, shareholder derivative, and corporate misconduct matters.

Cameran is part of Motley Rice’s securities litigation team. She is currently litigating securities claims against Archer Daniels-Midland Company and certain of its executives on behalf of shareholders. Additionally, Cameran is part of the team representing shareholders against Seagate Technology Holdings and its CEO and CFO.

Prior to joining Motley Rice, Cameran worked in the Chicago office of another national plaintiffs’ litigation firm focusing on securities litigation and shareholder rights. In that role, she was part of the litigation team in Flynn v. Exelon Corp., a matter arising from the alleged concealment of the multi-year bribery of a public official. This case resulted in a $173 million* settlement, the seventh largest securities class action settlement in the Seventh Circuit. Most recently, she was part of the team that achieved a $60 million* settlement in Allison v. Oak Street Health, Inc. Additionally, she worked as an Assistant State’s Attorney with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office in Chicago in the Civil Actions Bureau. While in law school, Cameran served as a Senior Editor for Loyola’s Consumer Law Review and was the recipient of three CALI awards.

Awards, Accolades & Recognitions

Super Lawyers

2024-2025 Rising Stars list

Blog Posts

July 6, 2023

Social media’s grip on teen mental health

by: Laura K. Stemkowski

January 8, 2021

Clicking with caution: Cybersecurity data breach risks are higher than ever Causes, Not Just Cases

by: Jodi Westbrook Flowers

August 12, 2020

Denied business interruption insurance payouts due to COVID-19 losses, some business owners may find justice in civil courts Causes, Not Just Cases

by: John A. Baden IV

News

January 5, 2026

Litigation firm Motley Rice expands its securities fraud and tort practices

by: Motley Rice

 

Cameran Michelle Gilliam (Mount Pleasant, South Carolina) View website

Reviews for Cameran Michelle

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 2
    • Consumer Fraud Protection
    • Securities Class Actions

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Motley Rice LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    CaseWork: Corporate Takeover Litigation: Securities Class Actions
    When directors
    officers of a public company decide to undertake a corporate transaction such as a merger, acquisition or leveraged buyout, we work with company shareholders to help maximize share value
    to avoid conflicts of...
    Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit: Securities Class Actions Antitrust
    Through shareholder derivative actions, we work with company investors to restore value lost to the company due to willful mismanagement, insider self-dealing or other acts of malfeasance.
    Securities Fraud: Securities Class Actions Antitrust
    Representing domestic
    foreign institutional investors-including union, pension,
    hedge funds-in recovering shareholder losses incurred due to corporate fraud.
  • Additional Links
    http://https//www.motleyrice.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Illinois
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Loyola University Chicago School of Law
    Class of 2019
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Florida
    Class of 2012
    B.A.

Contact Cameran Michelle Gilliam

Associate at Motley Rice LLC
Not yet reviewed

28 Bridgeside Blvd.Mount Pleasant, SC 29464U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Cameran Michelle Gilliam

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Motley Rice LLC has 120 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Motley Rice LLC was established in 2003.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions