×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Woods LLPAttorney
Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota

Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota

Not yet reviewed

Suite 1700, Montreal, QC H3A 3H3

Bankruptcy Litigation, Insolvency, Commercial Litigation and 3 more

About Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota

Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota is a lawyer practicing bankruptcy litigation, insolvency, commercial litigation and 3 other areas of law. Bogdan-Alexandru received a degree from Concordia University, Faculty of Arts in 2006, and has been licensed for 15 years. Bogdan-Alexandru practices at Woods LLP in Montreal, QC.

Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Bogdan-Alexandru

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Banking Law
  • Other 3
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Insolvency
    • Restructuring Cases

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    French
    Romanian
    Spanish
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Woods LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE MANDATES: Successfully represented international pop artist Justin Bieber before the Superior Court of Quebec, in the context of an international arbitration-related dispute with an event promoter in the matter 9302-7654 Quebec inc. (Team Productions) v. Bieber, 2017 QCCS 1100 (CanLII)
    Assistant to the Tribunal in the matter InfraRed Environmental Infrastructure GP Ltd. et al. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB 14/12
    Assistant to the Tribunal in a multi-million dollar arbitration dispute proceeding under the aegis of ICDR
    related to the oil
    gas industry
    Acts for Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. in defense of a $60 billion claim by the Government of Quebec against various tobacco manufacturers under the Tobacco-related Damages
    Health Care Costs Recovery Act
    Acts for an international mining corporation in the context of an international arbitration with a cross-border dispute with its provider of IT services
    Represents an international mining company in a cross-border dispute with one of its equipment suppliers before the Quebec Superior Court
    Successfully defended a professional liability suit against Lippman Leebosh April LLP
    obtained the dismissal of the claim brought against the auditors in the context of a corporate take-over transaction in the matter T
    alla inc. v. Lippman Leebosh April, 2015 QCCA 210 (CanLII)
    Acted for the court-appointed monitor in the context of the cross-border insolvency restructuring proceedings relative to Montreal Main & Atlantic Railway.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2011, Québec
    Memberships

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

    McGill University, Faculty of Law, coach of the moot team participating at the Willem C. Vis International Arbitration Moot Competition

    Teaching assistant to Professors Alain N. Tardif and Philippe H. Belanger at the University of Montreal, Faculty of Law, bankruptcy and insolvency course

    McGill University, Faculty of Engineering, guest lecturer for a course on bankruptcy and insolvency.

    ASSOCIATIONS
    Quebec Bar
    Canadian Bar Association
    Montreal Young Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Concordia University, Faculty of Arts
    Class of 2006
    Bachelor in Journalism and Political Sciences

    McGill University, Faculty of Law
    Class of 2010
    B.C.L./LL.B.

Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota

Attorney at Woods LLP
Not yet reviewed

2000 McGill College AvenueSuite 1700Montreal, QC H3A 3H3Canada

Email Bogdan-Alexandru Dobrota

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions