×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPPartner
Anne Merminod

Anne Merminod

Not yet reviewed

1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900, Montreal, QC H3B 5H4

Autonomous Vehicles, Class Actions, Competition, Antitrust and Foreign Investment and 3 more

About Anne Merminod

Anne Merminod is a lawyer practicing autonomous vehicles, class actions, competition, antitrust and foreign investment and 3 other areas of law. Anne received a B.A. degree from Concordia University in 2005, and has been licensed for 16 years. Anne practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Montreal, QC.

Anne Merminod (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Anne

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Other 5
    • Autonomous Vehicles
    • Competition, Antitrust and Foreign Investment
    • Insurance and Tort Liability
    • Litigation and Arbitration
    • Product Liability

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Anne Meminod defends numerous companies in a wide variety of class actions of both a national
    provincial scope, at the authorization stage, on the merits
    /or in settlement negotiations.
    Class Action - Consumer Protection
    Hebert v. Kia Canada Inc. - Defeated certification on behalf of Kia Canada in the defective Bluetooth system class action. The court upheld the decision in appeal.
    Martel v. Kia Canada inc. - Class Action involving alleged false representations regarding maintenance intervals in the owners' manuals.
    Gr
    maison v. Mazda Canada inc. - Class Action based on alleged false representation regarding the fuel consumption of vehicles.
    Rabin v. Hewlett Packard Canada Co. - Class Action related to HP printers rejecting non-compatible cartridges.
    Benabu v. JP Morgan Chase - Class Action alleging that 25 respondents violated the Consumer Protection Act by providing free trials to customers or promotional offers
    continuing to bill them at full price at the end of the promotional period.
    Volkswagen - Successful resolution of the Volkswagen emission class action which was approved by the Ontario
    Quebec Superior courts. This resolution is the largest consumer product settlement in Canada.
    Abicidan v. IKEA Canada Limited Partnership & al. - Class Action regarding the alleged defective chest of drawers that were involved in a recall by Health Canada.
    Fortin v. Mazda Canada - Product liability Class Action on the merits based on an alleged problem with door locks.
    Petrella v. Osram Sylvania Inc. - Class Action in Quebec
    Ontario regarding the alleged Automative Lighting Products.
    Class Action - Privacy law
    Lamoureux v. Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) - Breach of privacy class action.
    Sofio v. Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) - Obtained the dismissal of the appeal from the judgment dismissing Mr. Sofio's class action against IIROC, following the loss of personal information of 50,000 investors.
    Class Action - Competition Law
    Jacques v. Provigo & all. - Competition law class action regarding the alleged fuel cartel between gas stations in Sherbrooke, Magog, Thetford Mines
    Victoriaville.
    Cartise v. British Airways - Competition class action regarding the alleged cargo fees cartel between several air lines.
    Class Action - Pharmaceutical
    Health Law
    Paquin v. Sorin, Livanova & all - Class Action against the manufacturer of the cardiac leaking
    cooling system.
    Partouche v. Lachine Hospital - Class Action regarding the bariatric surgeries.
    Kelly v. Dr Bourdon
    Lakeshore General Hospital - Class Action regarding the colonoscopies recall.
    Larose v. Purdue Pharma inc. & all - Class Action regarding the alleged addiction, abuse
    overdose of Oxycontin.
    Class Action - other
    Belisle v. Volkswagen - Environmental Class Action regarding the alleged emissions of nitrous oxide of Volkswagen vehicles.
    Segalovich v. C.S.T. Consultants inc. & all - Class Action regarding the business of distributing, promoting
    sponsoring of Registered Education Savings Plans.
    Maxwell v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc./Loblaws & all - Class Action regarding the alleged practice at differentiating prices according to the gender of the consumer, commonly referred to as pink tax .
    Berdah v. Kiewit/Parsons & all - Class Action regarding the Turcot interchange.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Québec
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Directorship training (Board of Directors), Reseau des jeunes administrateurs (RJA), Montreal, Universite Laval (since September 2012)
    •Member, Quebec Bar Association
    •Member, Young Bar Association of Montreal
    •Member, Canadian Bar Association
    •Member, Jeune chambre de commerce de Montreal

    Community Involvement

    •Board member, Cuisine Atout (since 2013)
    •Representation of pro bono work done for the Make-a-Wish Quebec Foundation, in a dispute concerning a former employee, 2012
    •Information sessions and pro bono assistance to citizens in preparing for hearings before the Small Claims Court, 2010-2012
    •Participant, Idea Generation, Acces a la justice , Montreal (Quebec), 2011
    •Writer, McGill Journal of Law and Health, Faculty of Law, McGill University, 2007-2008
    •Vice-Chair for University Affairs, McGill University Law Students Association (LSA, 2006-2007)
    •Volunteer, Maison Plein Cur (centre for the prevention of HIV-AIDS), Montreal (Quebec), 4hrs/wk., 2003-2005

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    McGill University
    Class of 2008
    B.C.L.
    Civil Law and LL. B. Common Law
    Other Education
    Concordia University
    Class of 2005
    B.A.
    honours in History

    Concordia University exchange student in History, Institut d'Études politiques de Paris, Sciences Po, Paris, France, 2003

    McGill University exchange student in Legal Studies, National University of Singapore, 2008

Anne Merminod

Partner at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900Montreal, QC H3B 5H4Canada

Email Anne Merminod

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions