Sheppard MullinPartner

Jeffrey Liang

About Jeffrey Liang

Jeffrey Liang is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, esports & games, semiconductors and 2 other areas of law. Jeffrey received a B.S. degree from University of Texas in 2002, and has been licensed for 15 years. Jeffrey practices at Sheppard Mullin in Menlo Park, CA.

Reviews for Jeffrey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Patents
  • Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Esports & Games
    • Semiconductors

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representing leading streaming service provider in 15+ IPRs against Broadcom for patents related to video compression, DRM, adaptive streaming, web services, distributed computing,
    virtual machines.
    Represented leading streaming service provider in 2021 in a Central District of California patent dispute
    a corresponding IPR. Obtained institution of the IPR, after which Patent Owner surrendered all claims
    dismissed the district court action.
    Representing leading semiconductor company in 2 IPRs against IP Value Management subsidiary involving microcontrollers, FPGAs,
    other programmable devices, with both IPRs instituted
    all challenged claims found invalid in Final Written Decisions.
    Represented leading software provider in 2021 in Western District of Texas litigation involving 3 asserted patents before obtaining favorable dismissal.
    Represented leading streaming service provider in 7 instituted PTAB challenges relating to compression technology. To date over 85 claims have been found unpatentable across 5 patents.
    Represented leading semiconductor manufacturer in multiple IPR challenges concerning 802.11
    Bluetooth technology that were instituted
    all asserted claims found invalid.
    Represented a leading streaming provider of music in 4 IPR proceedings that settled shortly after the filing of the IPRs.
    Represented a leading streaming service provider of music in Delaware litigation. Case settled favorably.
    Represented leading online gaming company in an IPR
    appeal that invalidated all asserted claims of a patent related to video game design.
    In Fall of 2017, received a dismissal of a Central District of California lawsuit without any payment for a leading ride-share provider prior to even formally responding to the Complaint.
    Represented a leading medical device company in multiple IPR proceedings involving a competitor.
    Represented leading sporting goods company in the Central District of California litigation
    obtained dismissal before responding to complaint after sending Rule 11 letter.
    In Fall of 2016, received a dismissal of a Delaware lawsuit without any payment for a leading ride-share provider prior to even formally responding to the Complaint.
    In Spring of 2016, represented a leading financial services company defending against a claim of patent infringement in the Eastern District of Texas. Prior to having to file an Answer, received a walkaway dismissal with prejudice for the client.
    In 2016-2018, defended leading data storage company in patent litigation against competitor in the International Trade Commission, Southern District of New York,
    IPR proceedings.
    Defended leading telecommunications company in the Eastern District of Texas in a case involving TLS
    elliptic curve cryptography.
    Defended leading semiconductor manufacturer
    software company accused of patent infringement in the Eastern District of Texas in a case involving TLS
    RC4 encryption.
    Defended telecommunications company in competitor litigation in the Western District of Wisconsin.
    Defended leading networking company in a patent infringement case in the Northern District of Illinois, leading to a major RAND decision on IEEE 802.11.
    Defended leading networking company before the International Trade Commission in a dispute involving IEEE 802.3, st
    ards-related defenses,
    RAND issues.
    Defended leading cell-phone manufacturer accused of patent infringement in the Eastern District of Texas in a case involving RF transceivers.
    Defended leading software company accused of patent infringement in the District of Delaware in a case involving networking
    database services.
    Represented a leading vendor of RFID microchips for pets against a competitor in a Federal Circuit appeal.
    Advised various technology companies in patent licensing negotiations.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    United States District Court for the Northern District of California
    registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    2011, California
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Texas
    Class of 2011
    J.D.
    high honors; Order of the Coif; Associate Editor, Texas Law Review
    Other Education
    University of Texas
    Class of 2002
    B.S.
    Electrical Engineering
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: