Sheppard MullinPartner

Christopher Scott Ponder

About Christopher Scott Ponder

Christopher Scott Ponder is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, false advertising, lanham act and unfair competition, patent litigation and 6 other areas of law. Christopher received a degree from Articles Editor, Houston Law Review, Order of the Coif, and has been licensed for 18 years. Christopher practices at Sheppard Mullin in Menlo Park, CA.

Reviews for Christopher

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trade Secrets
  • Other 7
    • False Advertising, Lanham Act and Unfair Competition
    • Patent Litigation
    • Post-Grant Proceedings
    • Entertainment, Technology and Advertising
    • Esports & Games
    • Life Sciences
    • Semiconductors

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Inter Partes Review (IPR): Representing a leading streaming service as petitioner in 15+ IPRs
    related appeals to the Federal Circuit challenging patents asserted by Broadcom.
    Representing leading streaming services as petitioners in several IPRs
    related appeals challenging patents asserted by a Fortress-funded patent portfolio holding company.
    Defended a leader in implantable hearing solutions as the patent owner in an IPR brought by a competitor. All claims were found not unpatentable.
    Represented a leading music streaming service in 4 IPRs that settled shortly after filing.
    Represented a leader in wearable devices as petitioner in appeals from IPRs (Fed. Cir.). The Federal Circuit affirmed two final written decisions finding the claims unpatentable
    reversed
    rem
    ed a third final written decision that found some claims not unpatentable.
    Represented a leading streaming service in 7 IPRs relating to compression technology (over 85 claims found unpatentable across 5 patents).
    Represented a leading game developer in an IPR
    on appeal where all challenged claims held unpatentable following an unsuccessful IPR challenge by a different game developer.
    Represented a leader in wearable devices as petitioner in an IPR where the patent owner (a Wi-LAN subsidiary) disclaimed the challenged claims after institution.
    Patent Infringement Litigation: Representing leading software provider in a 3 patent assertion related to communication protocols, after successful transfer from the Eastern District of Texas (W.D. Tex.).
    Representing leading software provider in a 2 patent assertion related to electronic design automation for semiconductors (N.D. Cal.).
    Represented leading semiconductor company in 6 district court actions (D. Del.
    D. Mass.)
    an ITC investigation, with 11 asserted patents. Previously represented the same client in an ITC investigation that was voluntarily dropped by the plaintiff.
    Represented leading streaming service provider in district court (C.D. Cal.)
    corresponding IPR. Obtained institution of the IPR, after which patent owner surrendered all claims
    dismissed the district court action.
    Represented a leading video game company in litigation involving erasure code technology (W.D. Tex.). Case settled favorably.
    Defended a leading game developer in a district court action involving a non-practicing entity (C.D. Cal.). Case was dismissed after a successful inter partes review was upheld on appeal,
    the court found the case was exceptional
    awarded attorneys' fees against the NPE.
    Represented leading ticket website in district court litigation involving resale of tickets (W.D. Tex.). Plaintiff dismissed action without payment.
    Represented leading furniture manufacturers in district court litigation (E.D. Tex.)
    2 related IPRs concerning augmented reality technology. Case settled favorably.
    Represented a medical technology company in litigation against a competitor involving radiotherapy technology (N.D. Cal.),
    in related IPRs as the patent owner.
    Represented a major luxury retailer in litigation brought by a non-practicing entity (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a leading TV manufacturer in litigation involving various technologies including 802.11 wireless st
    ards (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a leading music streaming service in patent litigation (D. Del.).
    Represented a leading provider of satellite communications equipment
    satellite data service against claims of infringement involving satellite communications technologies brought by a major military contractor (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a provider of enterprise
    carrier real-time communications technology in patent infringement countersuit brought by a competitor involving telecommunications technologies (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a provider of enterprise
    carrier real-time communications technology in patent infringement action against a competitor involving VoIP, media gateway,
    session border controller technologies (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a provider of captioning services for hard of hearing users in competitor litigation involving captioned telephone technology (W.D. Wis.)
    developed petitioner's response to plaintiff's secondary considerations evidence in eight co-pending IPRs.
    Defended a leading telecommunications carrier against claims that its services infringe a patent directed to location-based services (E.D. Tex.).
    Defended a major computer company against claims that hard drives shipped with its computer systems infringe a patent directed to switchable hard drive acoustic properties (E.D. Tex.).
    Defended a major computer company against claims that its computer systems infringe a patent that covers transcoding video into a format for optical discs (E.D. Tex.).
    Represented a major computer company in a patent infringement action involving enterprise iSCSI storage systems (N.D. Tex.
    Fed. Cir.).
    Represented a U.S. appliance manufacturer in a patent infringement action involving refrigerator storage
    ice
    water dispensing systems (D. Del.).
    Copyright
    Trade Secret Infringement: Represented a leading game developer in a copyright infringement lawsuit against a video game developed by former employees (C.D. Cal.).
    Represented a leading game developer in an international arbitration involving former employees
    claims for unpaid royalties, breach of contract, breach of common law duties, improper solicitation,
    breach of confidentiality.
    Represented a provider of enterprise
    carrier real-time communications technology in competitor litigation involving trade secret misappropriation
    unfair competition counterclaims (E.D. Tex.
    Texas State court).
    Counseling: Assisted client with contracting for independent software support services that comply with their enterprise software licenses.
    Provided an opinion to a client analyzing their ownership rights in software works they derived from licensed software.
    Assisted client with providing intellectual property disclosures for their shelf offering registration.
    Apprised a client of their rights in software code developed for them by a third party contractor.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2014, California
    2008, Texas
    United States Patent and Trademark Office
    United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Ninth Circuit
    United States District Courts for the Central and Northern Districts of California
    United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •American Bar Association - Section of Intellectual Property Law

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Houston
    Class of 2008
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    Articles Editor, Houston Law Review, Order of the Coif

    University of Houston
    Class of 2004
    B.S.
    Computer Science, cum laude

    Member of the Honors College
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: