×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Conliffe, Sandmann & SullivanMember
Scott A. Johnson
Pro

Scott A. Johnson

Not yet reviewed

325 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202

Civil Litigation, Zoning Law, Surety Law and 4 more

About Scott A. Johnson

Scott A. Johnson is a seasoned attorney with bar admissions in Ohio (1995) and Kentucky (2001). He is also admitted to practice in the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky, the Southern District of Ohio, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Scott earned his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from the Salmon P. Chase College of Law and holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Cincinnati.

Scott is a member of the Kentucky and Ohio Bar Associations and has extensive experience across several practice areas, including civil litigation, zoning law, surety law, environmental law, construction law, business litigation, and procurement litigation. His comprehensive knowledge across these fields positions him as a valuable advocate for his clients.

 

Scott A. Johnson (Louisville, Kentucky) View website

Reviews for Scott A.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Environmental Law
  • Construction Law
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Zoning Law
    • Surety Law
    • Procurement Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Hume v. Franklin County Fiscal Court, 276 S.W.3d 748 (Ky. 2008)
    Louisville Arena Authority, Inc. v. RAM Engineering
    Construction, Inc., 415 S.W.3d 671 (Ky. App. 2013)
    Bluegrass Equine
    Tourism Foundation, Inc.
    KHPWESLUX, LLC v. Commonwealth, 2013 WL 1919567 (Ky. App. 2013)
    Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance
    Admin. Cabinet, et al., 2015 WL 510852 (Ky. App. 2015)
    Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance
    Admin. Cabinet, et al. v. Wingate, 460 S.W.3d 843 (Ky. 2015).
  • Additional Links
    https://cssattorneys.com/?page_id=121

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Ohio
    2001, Kentucky
    United States District Court for Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky
    United States District Court for Southern District of Ohio
    United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    Memberships
    Kentucky Bar Association
    Ohio Bar Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Salmon P. Chase College of Law
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Cincinnati
    Class of 1990
    B.S.

Email Scott A. Johnson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Scott A. Johnson was admitted in 1995 to the State of Ohio.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Scott A. Johnson is admitted to practice in Kentucky and Ohio.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Scott A. Johnson attended Salmon P. Chase College of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan was established in 1964.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions