×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Robie & Matthai A Professional CorporationAssociate
Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian

Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian

Not yet reviewed

350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3950, Los Angeles, CA 90071

Appellate Law, Insurance Coverage and Professional Malpractice

About Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian

Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian is a lawyer practicing appellate law, insurance coverage, professional malpractice. Natalie received a B.A. degree from University of Southern California in 1991, and has been licensed for 32 years. Natalie practices at Robie & Matthai A Professional Corporation in Los Angeles, CA.

Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian (Los Angeles, California)

Reviews for Natalie

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • Appellate Law
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Professional Malpractice

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Armenian
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Robie & Matthai A Professional Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Kazi v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2001 24 Cal.4th 871 (102 Cal.Rptr.2d)
    Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche, 31 Cal. 4th 728 (2003)
    Viner v. Sweet, 30 Cal. 4th 1232 (2003)
    Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior Court, 29 Cal. 4th 1096 (2003)
    USAA v. Superior Court, 93 Cal. App. 4th 633 (2002)
    Oliveros v. County of Los Angeles (2004) Cal.App.Lexis 1238, July 28, 2004, Case No. B163333
    Everett v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 649
    Wimsatt v. Superior Court (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 137
    Newell v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 1094
    Washington Mutual Bank v. State Farm General Insurance Company (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 639
    State Farm General Insurance Company v. Frake (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 568
    Reichert v. State Farm General Insurance Company (2012) 212 Cal.App.4th 1543
    Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1
    Colony Bancorp of Malibu, Inc. v. Patel (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 410.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1994, California
    1994, U.S. District Court, Southern, Eastern and Central Districts of California
    Memberships
    Los Angeles County Bar Association (Member: Appellate Judicial Evaluation Committee
    Appellate Courts Committee)
    American Bar Association
    State Bar of California
    Armenian Bar Association
    Association of Southern California Defense Counsel.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Southwestern University, School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Southern California
    Class of 1991
    B.A.
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Specialist, Appellate Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1969
    New York, N. Y., September 12, 1969

Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian

Associate at Robie & Matthai A Professional Corporation
Not yet reviewed

350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3950Los Angeles, CA 90071U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Robert N. Sacks
Pro
Robert N. Sacks
4.9
2
Appellate Practice lawyer
213-603-9565
View Profile
Norman Alan Pedersen
Pro
Norman Alan Pedersen
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
213-660-2403
View Profile
Edward Shield Renwick, (A Professional Corporation)
Pro
Edward Shield Renwick, (A Professional Corporation)
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
213-723-5717
View Profile
Shaun Khojayan
Pro
Shaun Khojayan
5.0
40
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

888-486-4410
View Profile
Arnold D. Larson
Pro
Arnold D. Larson
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
213-723-0877
View Profile

Email Natalie Ann Kouyoumdjian

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions