×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPAssociate
no photo
Pro

Tina Kang

Not yet reviewed

The Shard, Level 8, 32 London Bridge Street, London 10166, England

Litigation and UK Civil Fraud & Business Disputes

About Tina Kang

Tina Kang is temporarily on secondment to a client.

Tina Kang is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s London office. She focuses her practice on complex civil fraud claims and business disputes as well as investigations often involving allegations of fraud or money laundering. Tina’s cases invariably involve multi-jurisdictional issues and early strategic consideration.

Tina’s clients include both claimants and defendants in contentious cases of significant value, including high-net-worth individuals, corporate entities, and government agencies. She is experienced in litigation before the English High Court and has experience in international arbitration.

 

Tina Kang (London, ) View website

Reviews for Tina

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 1
    • UK Civil Fraud & Business Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Acting for the Swedish Pensions Agency, on behalf of the Kingdom of Sweden
    over 46,000 pension savers affected by the 'Falcon Fund Fraud'. Obtained an award of 107 million (inclusive of interest)
    5.5 million in costs: [2025] EWHC 1620. Obtained summary judgment for the sum of $51.5 million (inclusive of interest) against one of the defendants
    summary judgment for the sum of $35 million (inclusive of interest) against another defendant [2022] EWHC 2706 (Comm).
    Acting for the first
    main defendant in one of the largest disputes ever before the Commercial Court (worth in excess of $800m), involving alleged secret commissions in the Middle East
    Europe.
    Acting for a HNW individual
    others in a confidential investigation by a law enforcement agency.
    Acting for a company in a shareholder-director dispute concerning allegations of fraud
    misappropriation of company assets.
    Acting for a high-profile company in the United States in a joint-venture dispute, successfully terminating the relationship
    avoiding proceedings.
    Advising a U.S. company on the disclosure of documents to liquidators under the Insolvency Act 1986.
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/k/kang-tina

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    England and Wales
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Young Fraud Lawyers Association, 2021-Present
    •Member, Fraud Women's Network
    •Member, London Solicitor Litigation Association
    •Associate Member, Commercial Litigator's Forum
    •Co-Chair, GT London Social Mobility Network

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Sheffield
    LL.B.
    Upper Second Class Honours
    Other Education
    BPP Law School
    Legal Practice Course, Distinction

    University College London
    M.A.
    Human Rights, Distinction, Dean's List

Email Tina Kang

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Tina Kang attended University of Sheffield.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions