×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

The Noble Law Firm, LLCPrincipal
Antony Noble
Pro

Antony Noble

5.0
23 reviews

215 Union Boulevard, Suite 305, Lakewood, CO 80228

Appellate Practice, Criminal Appeals, Post-Conviction Remedies and 8 more

About Antony Noble

Recipient: Gideon Award 2010; Colorado Rising Stars 2010 and 2011.

Antony Noble (Lakewood, Colorado) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Antony Noble got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Antony

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
23
5.0
Lawyers.com
2
5.0
Martindale
14
5.0
Avvo
7
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Appellate Practice
Posted by anonymous
September 27, 2013
Hired Attorney

Mr. Noble was not only very knowledgeable and professional since the first time I contacted him, but very compassionate and honest. Mr. Noble successfully defended my son on an appeal that no other lawyer dared to take due to the time bar past for almost 10 years and the difficulties of the case. He never gave us false expectations or lied to us, he simply said he would give it his best & hope for good results. Mr. Noble fought as a champion, he defended my son with all his guts. Simply the best

 
Civil Rights
Posted by anonymous
August 22, 2012
Hired Attorney

Antony Noble is a man of integrity and loyalty. He enjoys what he does and exercises every opportunity to maximize the best outcome for his client under the law. He is very passionate and caring which is exhibited through his communication but orally and verbally. Antony never gives up on a fight that he believes wholehearted is a fight that by law is victorious for his client. I cannot say enough about this man his professionalism and dedicated service toward client and case as a representative

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Criminal Law 1
    • Juvenile Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Civil Rights
  • Other 6
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Post-Conviction Remedies
    • Juvenile Criminal Law
    • Juvenile Delinquency
    • Civil Appeals
    • Attorney Discipline

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates: $250 - $300/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Skype
    FaceTime
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    The Noble Law Firm, LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    People v. Senette, 2018 COA 105 (Colo. App. Jul. 26 2018)
    People v. Laeke, 2018 COA 78 (Colo. App. May 31, 2018)
    People v. S
    oval, 413 P.3d 1274 (Colo. 2018)
    People in the Interest of L.K., 407 P.3d 566 (Colo. 2017)
    Isom v. People, 407 P.3d 559 (Colo. 2017)
    People in the Interest of J.W., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017)
    Espino-Paez v. People, 395 P.3d 786 (Colo. 2017)
    Flores-Heredia v. People, 395 P.3d (Colo. 2017)
    Estrada-Huerta v. People, 394 P.3d 1139 (Colo. 2017)
    People v. Chavez-Torres, 2016 COA 169M (Colo. App. 2016)
    People v. Sosa, 2016 COA 93 (Colo. App. 2016)
    People v. Penn, 379 P.3d 298 (Colo. 2016)
    People v. Villanueva, 374 P.3d 535 (Colo. App. 2016)
    People v. Graves, 368 P.3d 317 (Colo. 2016)
    People v. Chavez, 359 P.3d 1040 (Colo. 2015)
    People v. Douglas, 2015 COA 155 (Colo. App. 2015)
    People v. Pendleton, 374 P.3d 509 (Colo. App. 2015)
    People v. Chipman, 370 P.3d 330 (Colo. App. 2015)
    People v. Isom, 410 P.3d 589 (Colo. App. 2015)
    United States v. Lozado, 776 F.3d 1119 (10th Cir. 2015)
    United States v. Margheim, 770 F.3d 1312 (10th Cir. 2014)
    People v. Espino-Paez, 410 P.3d 548 (Colo. App. 2014)
    In re: People v. Steen, 318 P.3d 487 (Colo. 2014)
    Dooly v. People, 302 P.3d 259 (Colo. 2013)
    People v. Lahr, 316 P.3d 74 (Colo. App. 2013)
    United States v. Hern
    ez, 711 F.3d 1194 (10th Cir. 2013)
    People v. Pleshakov, 298 P.3d 228 (Colo. 2013)
    Kazadi v. People, 291 P.3d 16 (Colo. 2012)
    Churchill v. University of Colorado, 285 P.3d 986 (Colo. 2012)
    People v. Ray, 302 P.3d 289 (Colo. App. 2012)
    People v. Laeke, 271 P.3d 1111 (Colo. 2012)
    People v. Kazadi, 284 P.3d 70 (Colo. App. 2011)
    Churchill v. Univeristy of Colorado, 293 P.3d 16 (Colo. App. 2010)
    People v. Sanchez, 253 P.3d 1260 (Colo. App. 2010)
    Crumb v. People, 230 P.3d 726 (Colo. 2010)
    People v. Alley, 232 P.3d 272 (Colo. App. 2010)
    People v. Everett, 250 P.3d 649 (Colo. App. 2010)
    People v. Laeke, 280 P.3d 1 (Colo. App. 2009)
    Edwards v. People, 196 P.3d 1138 (Colo. 2008)
    People v. Crumb, 203 P.3d 587 (Colo. App. 2008)
    United States v. Zapata, 546 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2008)
    Leyva v. People, 184 P.3d 48 (Colo. 2008)
    People v. Wallin, 167 P.3d 183 (Colo. App. 2007)
    People v. Reese, 155 P.3d 477 (Colo. App. 2006)
    People v. Martinez, 128 P.3d 291 (Colo. App. 2005)
    Verdecia v. Adams, 327 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 2003)
    Farmer v. Perrill, 288 F.3d 1254 (10th Cir. 2002)
    Farmer v. Perrill, 275 F.3d 958 (10th Cir. 2001).
  • Additional Links
    https://www.noble-law.com/antonynoble.htm https://www.noble-law.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, New York
    2002, Colorado
    2001, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Memberships
    Colorado Criminal Defense Bar (Member, 2005-, Board of Directors, 2010-2016)
    Tenth Circuit Criminal Justice Act Panel
    Faculty of Federal Advocates.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University College London
    Class of 1996
    LL.B.
    with honors
    Other Education
    The College of Law, London
    Class of 1997
    Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1965
    Leicester, United Kingdom, 1965

Activity

Email Antony Noble

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada? Click here
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Antony Noble has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Client Review rated?
    Yes, Antony Noble has a 5.0 Client Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Antony Noble will accept American Express, MasterCard, Visa and Discover.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Antony Noble attended University College London.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    The Noble Law Firm, LLC was established in 2008.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.