×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Daniel S. Bach
Pro

Daniel S. Bach

Not yet reviewed

146 East Milwaukee Street, Suite 120, Jefferson, WI 53549

Litigation, Civil Litigation and Criminal Litigation

About Daniel S. Bach

Criminal Justice Study Commission (Wisconsin), 2005— Wisconsin Sentencing Commission, 2003-2004; Associate Editor, University of Wisconsin Law Review (1983-1984); Instructor: United States Department of Justice, Trial and Appellate Advocacy; United States Bureau of Prisons, Trial Procedure. Judicial Law Clerk, United States District Judge Robert W. Warren (1984-1986). Assistant United States Attorney, WD Wisconsin (1986-2000). Chief of the Civil Division, U.S. Attorneys Office, WD Wisconsin (1988-2000). Special Counsel, U.S. Sentencing Commission (1992).

 

Daniel S. Bach (Jefferson, Wisconsin) View website

Reviews for Daniel S.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Criminal Litigation

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Wisconsin
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Western and Eastern District of Wisconsin
    Memberships
    State Bar of Wisconsin (Board of Governors, 2004—)
    Racine County and Dade County Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Bath, Bath, England

    University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance
    Class of 1980
    B.S.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1958
    1958

Contact Daniel S. Bach

Attorney at Lawton Cates, S.C.
Not yet reviewed

146 East Milwaukee Street, Suite 120Jefferson, WI 53549U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (608) 282-6252
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Saturday By appointment
  • Sunday By appointment

Email Daniel S. Bach

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Daniel S. Bach was admitted in 1984 to the State of Wisconsin.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Daniel S. Bach is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Lawton Cates, S.C. has 12 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Daniel S. Bach attended University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Lawton Cates, S.C. was established in 1958.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions