×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPOf Counsel
Sheri Kanesaka
Pro

Sheri Kanesaka

Not yet reviewed

18565 Jamboree Road Suite 500, Irvine, CA 92612-4410

Real Estate Litigation and Litigation

About Sheri Kanesaka

Sheri Kanesaka is a member of the Real Estate Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Orange County office. She focuses her practice on representing title insurance companies and their insureds in complex real estate and coverage litigation. She regularly handles matters involving title defects, conflicting lien priority, perfection issues, easements, boundary and encroachment disputes, bad faith insurance claims, escrow negligence, and tax liens. In addition, she has broad experience litigating commercial cases and representing creditors in bankruptcy matters.

Drawing from deep experience garnered through service within the in-house litigation group of one of the largest title insurance companies, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Sheri is adept at prosecuting and defending cases from inception through trial in federal, state, and bankruptcy courts and arbitration.

Concentrations

•Real estate
•Title insurance
•Insurance coverage and bad faith
•Commercial litigation
•Bankruptcy & Workouts

Judicial Clerkships

•Hon. Meredith A. Jury, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, 2005-2007

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars, 2012-2015

 

Sheri Kanesaka (Irvine, California) View website

Reviews for Sheri

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Real Estate Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Japanese
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Previous Experience: Analyst, Goldman Sachs & Co., Equities Division, 2000-2002
    Teaching Experience: Lecturer in Law, USC Gould School of Law, 2023-Present
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/k/kanesaka-sheri

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    California
    Hawaii
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •American Land Title Association (ALTA) - Member
    •California Land Title Association (CLTA) - Affiliate Member
    •President, Little Tokyo Legacy Foundation
    •Board Member, USC Marshall Alumni Association of Orange County, 2019-Present
    •Board Member, Little Tokyo Business Association, Los Angeles, 2023-Present
    •Junior Leagues of California State Public Affairs Committee, Co-Chair, 2023-2024

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Southern California
    Class of 2005
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California, Berkeley
    Class of 1998
    B.A.

Email Sheri Kanesaka

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Sheri Kanesaka is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Sheri Kanesaka speaks Japanese.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Sheri Kanesaka attended University of Southern California.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions