×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. Wayne C. Turner
Pro

Mr. Wayne C. Turner

5.0
1 review

111 Monument Circle, Suite 4400, Indianapolis, IN 46204-5100

Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Appellate and 7 more

About Mr. Wayne C. Turner

Benchmark, America's Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys, highly recommended in business litigation, 2008-; Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® in the fields of Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, Litigation - Banking & Finance, Litigation - Municipal, and Litigation - Securities, 2005-; The Best Lawyers in America®, Indianapolis Municipal Litigation Lawyer of the Year, 2012; Indianapolis Securities Litigation Lawyer of the Year, 2013; Law & Politics Magazine, Indiana Super Lawyers, voted by peers among top 50 lawyers in Indiana, 2004-; voted among top 10 lawyers in Indiana, 2012-2013; Selected for inclusion in Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business, recommended among top Indiana lawyers in Business Litigation, 2003-present; Indiana Law Review Note Development Editor; Order of the Barristers.

 

Mr. Wayne C. Turner (Indianapolis, Indiana) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Wayne C. Turner got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Wayne C.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 6
    • Appellate
    • Securities/Anti-Trust Litigation
    • Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition
    • Commercial
    • Appellate Practice Section
    • Litigation Section

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Hoover Hull Turner LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Horizon League v. Butler University
    Simon Property Group, Inc.
    Simon Property Group, L.P. v. Theodore Boehm, as Successor Trustee of the Melvin Simon Family Enterprises Trust, Hamilton Superior Court Cause No. 29D03-1001-PL-00093
    Bren Simon, as Trustee of the Melvin Simon Family Enterprises Trust v. Deborah J. Simon, Simon Property Group, Inc., et al., 957 N.E.2d 980
    Indiana Ass'n of Residential Child Care Agencies v. Indiana Dep't of Child Services, S.D. Ind. Case No. 1:09-cv-1574-SEB-MJD
    State of Indiana ex rel. Indiana Securities Commissioner v. Marcus Schrenker, et al., Hamilton Circuit Court Cause No. 29C01-0904-PL-602
    Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, Allen Superior Court Cause No. 02D01-0910-PL-400
    City of Greenwood et al. v. Town of Bargersville et al., 930 N.E.2d 58 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), trans. denied
    Fred W. Meyer, Jr., et al. v. Robert Nelms
    Ansure Mortuaries of Indiana, LLC, et al., Johnson Circuit Court Cause No. 41C01-0801-MF-0001
    Flying J Inc. v. City of New Haven, et al., Seventh Circuit Appeal No. 08-2319, December 5, 2008
    Franklin College of Indiana v. Franklin University, Inc., U.S. District Court, S.D. Ind. Case No. 1:09-cv-00830-WTL-TAB, July 2009
    Lawler Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bradley Corporation, Fed. Circuit Appeal No. 2007-1533, May 27, 2008
    Madison Tool
    Die, Inc. v. ZF Sachs Automotive of America, Inc., U.S. District Court, S. D. Ind. Case No. 4:06-cv-00074-JDT, March 20, 2008
    Brockmann Enterprises LLC v. City of New Haven, 861 N.E.2d 725
    Hilliard Lyons v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, National Ass'n of Securities Dealers
    Gold Seal Termite And Pest Control Co., et al., on behalf of themselves
    others similarly situated, v. PrimeTV, LLC
    DIRECTV, Inc., Marion Superior Court
    Flynn & Zinkan Realty Co. v. Town of Westfield, et al., Hamilton Superior Court
    M-Plan, Inc., et al. v. Indiana Comprehensive Health Insurance Association
    Sally McCarty, 809 N.E.2d 834
    Polinsky
    Sutker v. Violi, 803 N.E.2d 684
    Indiana Comprehensive Health Insurance Association, et al. v. Avemco Insurance Company, et al., 812 N.E.2d 108
    Barnett, et al. v. Liberty Corporation
    Fortis, S.D. Ind. Case No. IP98-0113C-Y/G
    AAMA v. Kendrick, 244 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2001), cert denied, 534 U.S. 994
    Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. William Craig Dobbs, et al., Hamilton Superior Court Case No. 29D01-0209-PL-661
    United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co., Inc., ProLiance Energy, Inc., et al., 735 N.E.2d 790
    Adams v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
    Ameritech Services, Inc., 2 F. Supp. 2d 1077-1134
    Midwest Gas Services, Inc., et al. v. Indiana Gas Co., Inc.
    ProLiance Energy LLC, 317 F.3d 703
  • Additional Links
    http://hooverhullturner.com/person/turner/ http://www.hooverhullturner.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1985, Indiana
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th, 7th and Federal Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Illinois
    Memberships
    Indianapolis Bar Association
    Seventh Circuit Bar Association
    Indiana State Bar Association
    American Bar Association. Member: Lawyers' Club of Indianapolis, 2006—
    Defense Research Institute, 1995—
    National Institute for Trial Advocacy
    Midwest Region faculty instructor, 1995— President, Indianapolis Law Club, 2008—. fellow: Indianapolis Bar Foundation (Distinguished fellow)
    Litigation Counsel of America (Founding fellow).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Indiana University
    Class of 1985
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    Purdue University
    Class of 1982
    B.S.
    with highest distinction

    Purdue University
    Class of 1982
    B.S.
    Economics

    Purdue University
    Class of 1982
    B.S.
    Ross Outstanding Graduate

Contact Mr. Wayne C. Turner

Partner at Hoover Hull Turner LLP
5.0
1 review

Chase Tower, 111 Monument Circle, Suite 4400Indianapolis, IN 46204-5100U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 317-822-0234
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Mr. Wayne C. Turner

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. Wayne C. Turner was admitted in 1985 to the State of Indiana.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Mr. Wayne C. Turner is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan and United States Supreme Court.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Mr. Wayne C. Turner has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Hoover Hull Turner LLP has 19 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Hoover Hull Turner LLP was established in 2001.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions