×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Rangely, CO Immigration Law Firms & Lawyers

5 Results have been found for immigration attorneys in Rangely, Colorado, belonging to 4 different law firms. Find trusted legal representation by reading our detailed profiles, peer endorsements, and client reviews. Below you will find Rangely law firms that provide immigration services. To see attorneys, use the tab below. Showing results for Immigration within 75 miles of Rangely, CO
Filter by
Law Firms Lawyers
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Rangely Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Rangely Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Rangely Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Law Office of Imelda Mulholland, LLC

  • 397 Ridges Blvd., Grand Junction, CO 81507

Burke, Holguin, & Smith, P.C.

  • 2779 Crossroads Boulevard, Grand Junction, CO 81506-8786

Lawyers At This Firm

Robert S. McCormick, Attorney at Law

  • 743 Horizon Court, Suite 302A, Grand Junction, CO 81506

ADVERTISEMENT
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

Looking for Immigration Lawyers in Rangely?

Immigration lawyers help individuals, families, and businesses navigate the complex laws governing entry and residence in the United States. They handle matters such as visas, green cards, citizenship applications, asylum claims, and deportation defense. Their expertise is crucial for overcoming bureaucratic hurdles and achieving immigration goals successfully.

About our Immigration Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
64 %

14 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.1

3 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Immigration Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Am going to get diported for a misdeminor class A domestic violence convction reckless assault?

Alan Lee
Answered by attorney Alan Lee
Immigration lawyer at Alan Lee Arthur Lee, Attorneys at Law
A conviction based on recklessness alone is not sufficient to sustain a charge of deportability for domestic violence as it does not fit the definition of a crime of violence. Although crimes involving domestic violence are ones for which there are no waivers, the crime must have a requisite mental state of intent, and recklessness in an assault case would generally not meet the standard. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
A conviction based on recklessness alone is not sufficient to sustain a charge of deportability for domestic violence as it does not fit the definition of a crime of violence. Although crimes involving domestic violence are ones for which there are no waivers, the crime must have a requisite mental state of intent, and recklessness in an assault case would generally not meet the standard. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
Read More Read Less

Is it good timing to submit my application for the citizenship now before the US election do you think I will expect delays?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Mary Lyn Tanawan Sanga (Unclaimed Profile)
Immigration lawyer at Law Offices of Mary Lyn T. Sanga A Professional Corporation
It generally takes 4-5 months for USCIS to adjudicate N-400 citizenship applications. Since it is mid-September now, you might not be able to get your citizenship done in time for the November election.
It generally takes 4-5 months for USCIS to adjudicate N-400 citizenship applications. Since it is mid-September now, you might not be able to get your citizenship done in time for the November election.
Read More Read Less

How long is immigration court after detain?

Justin Wang
Answered by attorney Justin Wang (Unclaimed Profile)
Immigration lawyer at Sheppard Mullin
That will depend on the location and the available relief you may have. In general detained cases are processed faster. It is possible it may take several months before you first see a judge.
That will depend on the location and the available relief you may have. In general detained cases are processed faster. It is possible it may take several months before you first see a judge.
Read More Read Less

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions