×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Winston & Strawn LLPPartner
no photo

Floyd R Nation

Not yet reviewed

1111 Louisiana, 25th Fl., Houston, TX 77002-5242

Intellectual Property, Mediation, Patent Litigation and 3 more

About Floyd R Nation

Floyd R Nation is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, mediation, patent litigation and 3 other areas of law. Floyd received a B.M.E. degree from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1968, and has been licensed for 52 years. Floyd practices at Winston & Strawn LLP in Houston, TX.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Floyd R Nation got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Floyd

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Mediation
  • Other 4
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Technology Litigation
    • Trademark Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Chinese
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Winston & Strawn LLP

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1974, Texas
    United States District Court
    California Northern District Court
    Louisiana Western District Court
    Nebraska District Court
    Texas Eastern District Court
    Texas Northern District Court
    Texas Southern District/Bankruptcy Court
    Texas Western District Court
    Wisconsin Eastern District Court
    US Patent and Trademark Office
    1975, Louisiana
    United States Supreme Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    Arizona District Court
    Bar Fellowship

    Pro Bono

    · Boone and Crockett Club, Chair, Legal Committee.

    Publications & Speaking Engagements

    Articles

    "A 'Markman' Hearing Can Determine Case Outcome: It Is Prudent to Have a Litigator Experienced in Drafting Claims and Getting Them through PTO." The National Law Journal (May 24, 1999).

    "A Strong IP Program: A Necessity of Modern Corporate Life." World Energy Magazine 1, No. 2 (1998).

    Books

    Nonobviousness-The Ultimate Condition of Patentability. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 1980, Part 4, "Proving Section 103 Nonobviousness," edited by John F. Witherspoon. Co-authored with Tom Arnold.

    Member: Houston Bar Association; State Bar of Texas (Chairman, Intellectual Property Law Section, 1992-1993); American Bar Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association; Austin Intellectual Property Law Association (President, 1991); Houston Intellectual Property Law Association. Fellow: Texas Bar Foundation (Life Fellow).

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Texas School of Law
    Class of 1974
    J.D.
    with honors
    Other Education
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    Class of 1968
    B.M.E.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1946
    Winder, Georgia, October 21, 1946

Floyd R Nation

Partner at Winston & Strawn LLP
Not yet reviewed

1111 Louisiana, 25th Fl.Houston, TX 77002-5242U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Charlie Henke
Pro
Charlie Henke
5.0
4
Intellectual Property lawyer
346-553-8297
View Profile
Lance Christopher Kassab
Pro
Lance Christopher Kassab
4.8
16
Intellectual Property lawyer
346-601-3490
View Profile
Timothy J. Maier
Pro
Timothy J. Maier
4.7
15
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

571-596-6362
View Profile
Nick C. Nichols
Pro
Nick C. Nichols
5.0
1
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

346-800-3269
View Profile
Clyde James Jackson III
Pro
Clyde James Jackson III
5.0
4
Intellectual Property lawyer
346-692-9880
View Profile

Email Floyd R Nation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions