Michael Christopher Collins

About Michael Christopher Collins

Michael Christopher Collins is a lawyer practicing litigation & dispute resolution, municipal & state government, tax assessment/collection & appeals. Michael received a B.A. degree from Trinity College in 1983, and has been licensed for 40 years. Michael practices at Halloran & Sage LLP in Hartford, CT.

Awards

Reviews for Michael

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Municipal & State Government
    • Tax Assessment/Collection & Appeals

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Halloran & Sage LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Rep Matters: State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Sayles 289 F.3d 181, 2002 WL 832014, C.A.2 (Conn.), May 02, 2002 (NO. 01-7186)
    H & S Secures Reversal on Municipal Tax Ruling
    In Gene Kasica v. Town of Columbia, SC 18968, Halloran & Sage ( Laura Pascale Zaino
    Michael Collins), on behalf of the Town of Columbia ( the Town ), secured a reversal by the Connecticut Supreme Court of a trial court judgment holding that municipal assessors did not have authority to tax partially completed construction. The plaintiff had challenged the Town of Columbia's assessor's valuations of his partially constructed, three story, plantation-style house for the 2008
    2009 gr
    lists. In 2008, the assessor determined that construction was 35% complete
    adjusted the property's assessment on the 2008 gr
    list to reflect that. In 2009, the assessor determined that construction was 40% complete
    adjusted the property's assessment on the 2009 gr
    list to reflect that. The plaintiff appealed those valuations to the trial court.
    The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the assessor could not legally increase the assessed value of the property based solely on the new construction because interim assessments are governed by 12-53a.... The trial court concluded that that statute governed the assessments at issue
    held that [b]ecause an interim assessment under 12-53a (a) cannot commence until after new construction is completed, the assessor acted outside of [her] statutory m
    ate by performing an interim assessment when the property was [incomplete]. In reaching this conclusion, the trial court rejected the Town's argument that Conn. Gen. Stat. 12-55 governed the analysis
    afforded the assessor with the authority to tax the partially completed construction.
    On appeal, the Town argued that the assessor had the authority to tax partially completed construction pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. 12-55. The Town also argued that the trial court improperly applied Conn. Gen. Stat. 12-53a to the facts of this case because 12-53a only applied to completed new construction. The Supreme Court agreed with the Town
    reversed the trial court judgment.
    In doing so, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the conclusion it reached in 84 Century Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Tax Review, 207 Conn. 250, 262 (1988) that 12-55 provides assessors with broad authority to conduct interim assessments of real property
    further determined, as a question of first impression, that that authority extends to taxing partially completed construction. It found support for this conclusion in the statutory scheme governing the taxation of real property in Connecticut which provides, among other things, that all improvements to building lots are taxable. Conn. Gen. Stat. 12-64. The partially completed construction improved the plaintiff's building lot
    was, therefore, taxable.
    The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's argument, which echoed the trial court's determination, that Conn. Gen. Stat. 12-53a governed the analysis. Instead, it agreed with the Town that 12-53a was strictly limited to assessing
    taxing completed new construction
    that because the construction at issue was only partially completed at the time of the assessments, it had no bearing on the facts of this case.
    In sum, the Supreme Court has confirmed that partially completed construction is,
    always has been, taxable in Connecticut. This important holding confirms the propriety of a longst
    ing practice by municipal assessors throughout the state to tax partially completed construction, as well as the income municipalities have generated by their doing so.
    HLO L
    Ownership Associates, Ltd Partnership v. City of Hartford, 248 Conn. 350 (1999)
    Xerox Corp v. BTR City of Hartford, 240 Conn. 192 (1997)
    City of Hartford v. Stanley V. Tucker, 225 Conn. 211 (1993)
    IBM Credit Corp. v. BTR of City of Hartford, 227 Conn. 826 (1993)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1986, Connecticut
    1986, District of Connecticut
    Memberships

    Associations

    Connecticut Bar Association
    Hartford County Bar Association
    Connecticut Association of Municipal
    Attorneys
    Connecticut Conference of Municipalities

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Connecticut School of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Trinity College
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    History
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    February 26, 1961

Michael Christopher Collins

Partner at Halloran & Sage LLP
Not yet reviewed

One Goodwin Square, 225 Asylum StreetHartford, CT 06103U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Steven J. Barber
Pro
Steven J. Barber
4.6
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Scott T. Ober
Pro
Scott T. Ober
4.4
Litigation lawyer
James M. Moher
Pro
James M. Moher
4.5
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Robert J T Britt
Pro
Robert J T Britt
4.9
Litigation lawyer
no photo
Pro
Steven L. Seligman
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: