×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Share Holder
Kevin G. Thomas
Pro

Kevin G. Thomas

Not yet reviewed

89 Kercheval Avenue, Suite 200, Grosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236

Admiralty and Maritime, Construction Law, Insurance Law and Litigation and 1 more

About Kevin G. Thomas

Kevin G. Thomas is a shareholder of Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. His practice is concentrated in insurance litigation, including architect and engineer malpractice, errors and omissions, admiralty and maritime law, and premises liability, and with a particular emphasis in automobile accident litigation.

Prior to joining Dickie McCamey, Mr. Thomas practiced with Thomas, DeGrood & Witenoff. While in law school, he served as a legal intern for the City of Warren Attorney’s Office and the 35th District Court of Michigan.

Professional Accomplishments

•Michigan Super Lawyers - Rising Stars 2022-2023

Community

•Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
•Racquet Up Detroit

Presentations & Publications

Speaking Engagements

•“Michigan’s No-Fault Amendment: Senate Bill No. 1” (Presenter); Traverse City, MI; 3/5/2020
•“Michigan’s No-Fault Act” (Presenter); Southfield, MI; 6/21/2019

Press Releases

1/3/2024 Press Releases

Dickie McCamey Elects Four New Shareholders

Transportation Law Insights

11/21/2022 Insights Transportation Law Insights

The Importance of a Formal Denial in a Post No-Fault Reform World

 

Kevin G. Thomas (Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan) View website

Reviews for Kevin G.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Other 3
    • Admiralty and Maritime
    • Insurance Law and Litigation
    • Professional Liability Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Roe v. Mich. Int'l. Speedway, Inc., No. 342857, 2019 Mich. App. LEXIS 1137 (April 18, 2019): opinion by Judges Jansen
    Meter on an issue of first impression after summary disposition was granted in favor of the defendant premises owner. Affirming the decision of the trial court, it was held that the hazardous condition - a steep drop off into a creek in a wooded, unlit area - was open
    obvious.
  • Additional Links
    https://www.dmclaw.com/attorneys/kevin-g-thomas/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Michigan Bar Admission
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
    United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
    2013, Michigan
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •Bayview Yacht Club
    •Detroit Athletic Club

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Wayne State University Law School
    Class of 2013
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Michigan State University
    Class of 2009
    B.A.
    Economics, Cognate in Business

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Kevin G. Thomas

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Kevin G. Thomas was admitted in 2013 to the State of Michigan.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. has 194 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Kevin G. Thomas attended Wayne State University Law School.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Kevin G. Thomas is listed in the General Practice section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions