×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Bankruptcy Law GroupPrincipal
Chad M. Johnson
Pro

Chad M. Johnson

5.0
3 reviews

2377 Gold Meadow Way, #100, Gold River, CA 95670

Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Chapter 7, Bankruptcy Chapter 13 and 7 more

Reviews for Chad M.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
3
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Avvo
3

Services

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 13
  • Other 7
    • Stop Foreclosure
    • Stop Repossession
    • Stop Wage Garnishment
    • Resolve Credit Card Debt
    • Resolve Medical Debt
    • Resolve Tax Debt
    • Non-Bankruptcy Solutions

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Other
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Google Hangouts
    FaceTime
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Bankruptcy Law Group
  • Additional Links
    https://www.bankruptcylg.com/bankruptcy-attorneys/chad-johnson

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, California
    2005, U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
    2005, U.S. District Court Northern District of California
    2005, U.S. District Court Southern District of California
    2008, U.S. District Court Central District of California
    Memberships
    American Bankruptcy Institute
    Sacramento Valley Bankruptcy Forum
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific
    Class of 2004
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Arizona State University
    Class of 2001
    B.S.
    Business Economics
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Mesa, Arizona

Email Chad M. Johnson

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada? Click here
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Chad M. Johnson was admitted in 2004 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Chad M. Johnson is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Chad M. Johnson speaks Spanish.
  • Does this attorney maintain a practice in more than one location?
    Yes, Chad M. Johnson has a presence in Elk Grove, CA; Fairfield, CA and Roseville, CA.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Chad M. Johnson attended McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.