AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Palm Coast Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Palm Coast Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Palm Coast Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Richard F. Devall

3.1
1 Review
  • 204 S. Riverwalk Drive, Palm Coast, FL 32137

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer

  • A law firm practicing dui/dwi law.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersChild Support, Criminal Defense, and 13 more

Richard Fulmer Devall
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms
  • 20 Airport Road, Suite C, Palm Coast, FL 32164+3 locations

  • Law Firm with 6 lawyers2 awards

  • Seeking Justice for the Injured

  • DUI/DWI LawyersAccidents, Automobile Accidents and Injuries, and 16 more

  • Free Consultation

  • Offers Video

  • Serving Palm Coast, FL and Flagler County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer2 awards

  • Providing bankruptcy solutions in Florida for more than 13 years and Immigration assistance for 2 years. Get the Experience you need when you need it the most. Call us today we can... Read More

  • DUI/DWI LawyersBankruptcy Chapter 7, Bankruptcy Chapter 13, and 216 more

Carol Marie Galloway
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rice Law Firm

4.7
118 Reviews
  • Serving Palm Coast, FL and Flagler County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 6 lawyers3 awards

  • Attorney at Law

  • DUI/DWI LawyersDivorce, Family Law, and 31 more

Philip J. Bonamo
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Canan Law

4.8
48 Reviews
  • Serving Palm Coast, FL

  • Law Firm with 5 lawyers2 awards

  • Former Prosecutors with over 30 years experience. Criminal Defense, DUI/DWI, Auto Accidents, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Family Law, Divorce.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersAssault and Battery, Burglary, and 71 more

  • Free Consultation

Andrew Morgan
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms
  • Serving Palm Coast, FL and Flagler County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer3 awards

  • Criminal Law, Real Estate, Civil Litigation, Family Law, Probate

  • DUI/DWI LawyersCriminal Law, Civil Litigation, and 6 more

  • Free Consultation

Tonya Cromartie
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

The Albaugh Law Firm

4.7
26 Reviews
  • Serving Palm Coast, FL and Flagler County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 3 lawyers2 awards

  • On Your Side... Fighting For You.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersBankruptcy, Criminal Law, and 44 more

  • Free Consultation

  • Offers Video

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our DUI/DWI Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
96 %

135 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.6

214 Peer Reviews

Commonly Asked DUI/DWI Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

At which point does an officer have to read you your rights after being placed under arrest for dui

David William Olson
Answered by attorney David William Olson (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at The Law Offices of David W. Olson
Many folks wrongly but reasonably believe that a police officer must immediately inform an arrested person that he or she has the right to remain silent and other rights.  They are referring to "Miranda" rights, or warnings, which in fact must be provided to an individual by a police officer if two conditions exist: First, the individual must be "in custody."  That doesn't necessarily require handcuffing or the actual restraint of one's physical liberty.  A person is "in custody" if, given all of the attendant circumstances, a reasonable person in the given situation would believe that he or she is not free to leave the presence of the officer.  Secondly, the officer must intend to ask questions of the person who is "in custody." Standard procedure by police in DUI investigations is to not provide Miranda warnings until after "non-testimonial" aspects of the investigation have occurred.  Those would include roadside sobriety tasking and breath, blood or urine gathering.  That is because they know that Miranda warnings may cause an arrested person to not cooperate with that part of the investigation. If a person, without Miranda warnings being provided, at any time during any investigation, states to a police officer that he or she wants to consult with a lawyer, or is unwilling to answer any questions, there can be no interrogation.   So, during the investigation when you mentioned your desire to speak to an attorney, you were then invoking your Constitutional rights to an attorney and to silence.
Many folks wrongly but reasonably believe that a police officer must immediately inform an arrested person that he or she has the right to remain silent and other rights.  They are referring to "Miranda" rights, or warnings, which in fact must be provided to an individual by a police officer if two conditions exist: First, the individual must be "in custody."  That doesn't necessarily require handcuffing or the actual restraint of one's physical liberty.  A person is "in custody" if, given all of the attendant circumstances, a reasonable person in the given situation would believe that he or she is not free to leave the presence of the officer.  Secondly, the officer must intend to ask questions of the person who is "in custody." Standard procedure by police in DUI investigations is to not provide Miranda warnings until after "non-testimonial" aspects of the investigation have occurred.  Those would include roadside sobriety tasking and breath, blood or urine gathering.  That is because they know that Miranda warnings may cause an arrested person to not cooperate with that part of the investigation. If a person, without Miranda warnings being provided, at any time during any investigation, states to a police officer that he or she wants to consult with a lawyer, or is unwilling to answer any questions, there can be no interrogation.   So, during the investigation when you mentioned your desire to speak to an attorney, you were then invoking your Constitutional rights to an attorney and to silence.
Read More Read Less

DUI first offence

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Charles D. Scott (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at The Law Offices of Charles D. Scott PLLC
You mentioned that you obtained a lawyer, I suppose my first question to you is have you discussed your concerns with your lawyer, as he/she would be in the best position to discuss your case. You did not state whether you submitted to a breath test, it sounds like you did not based upon what you wrote. If you submit to a breath test the results will either show you were not impaired as defined by a BAC under .08, or you were presumed impaired if BAC was over .o8.  If you refuse the breath test you give up the opportunity to show that your BAC was under .08.  As for the questions, field sobriety tests, and breath test, the law is clear that you are not entitled to a lawyer for field sobriety testing or breath testing. The only time you are entitled to a lawyer is during questioning. The officer should have read you your miranda rights before asking you any questions. however any spontaneous statement made by you which was not in response to a question, is evidence,  and not protected by Miranda. Most police have a video tape rolling in in the breath testing room and any statements made should be on tape. With regard to your passing or believing you passed the field sobriety tests, there are six to eight clues related to each test that determine whether you passed or not. These tests are divided attention tests and designed to not only assess your physical ability but also your mental ability to listen and follow direction, something which decreases with impairment. Many people believe they passed the field sobriety tests but actually failed based on the assessment criteria.  
You mentioned that you obtained a lawyer, I suppose my first question to you is have you discussed your concerns with your lawyer, as he/she would be in the best position to discuss your case. You did not state whether you submitted to a breath test, it sounds like you did not based upon what you wrote. If you submit to a breath test the results will either show you were not impaired as defined by a BAC under .08, or you were presumed impaired if BAC was over .o8.  If you refuse the breath test you give up the opportunity to show that your BAC was under .08.  As for the questions, field sobriety tests, and breath test, the law is clear that you are not entitled to a lawyer for field sobriety testing or breath testing. The only time you are entitled to a lawyer is during questioning. The officer should have read you your miranda rights before asking you any questions. however any spontaneous statement made by you which was not in response to a question, is evidence,  and not protected by Miranda. Most police have a video tape rolling in in the breath testing room and any statements made should be on tape. With regard to your passing or believing you passed the field sobriety tests, there are six to eight clues related to each test that determine whether you passed or not. These tests are divided attention tests and designed to not only assess your physical ability but also your mental ability to listen and follow direction, something which decreases with impairment. Many people believe they passed the field sobriety tests but actually failed based on the assessment criteria.  
Read More Read Less

What is my next step besides turning myself in to jail without legal counsel?

Gunther Omar Sanabria
Answered by attorney Gunther Omar Sanabria (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Sanabria Associates
Probably the first thing to do is contact your PO to determine the status of you case. Most likely there was a violation hearing and you didn't know about it. Best case scenario, it didn't take place and an attorney could do something for you. Hope it helps.
Probably the first thing to do is contact your PO to determine the status of you case. Most likely there was a violation hearing and you didn't know about it. Best case scenario, it didn't take place and an attorney could do something for you. Hope it helps.
Read More Read Less