AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Coupland Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Coupland Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Coupland Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Key Law Firm

4.3
18 Reviews

  • Serving Coupland, TX and Williamson County, Texas

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer2 awards

  • Reasonable rates—high quality representation throughout Austin area—honest—reliable. Call today 623-288-8930.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersFamily Law, Divorce, and 8 more

Larry P. Schaubhut Jr.
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Law Office of Steven Wittekiend

4.9
2 Reviews

  • Serving Coupland, TX and Williamson County, Texas

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer1 award

  • The Law Office of Steven Wittekiend Represents Clients with Legal Concerns in Family Law, Criminal Defense and Civil Law

  • DUI/DWI LawyersFamily Law, Criminal Law, and 10 more

Steven Wittekiend
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our DUI/DWI Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
95 %

11 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4

5 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked DUI/DWI Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Can an officer be considered in persuit of someone if they are not using their lights or sirens?

Kenneth G. Wincorn
Answered by attorney Kenneth G. Wincorn
DUI/DWI lawyer at Law Offices of Kenneth G. Wincorn & Associates, P.C.
Proof of the offense requires knowledge on  his part that he new or should have known so there is a potential defense to be used
Proof of the offense requires knowledge on  his part that he new or should have known so there is a potential defense to be used

Do I have to mention a pending paraphernalia charge at my preliminary hearing for a DUI?

Hudson Thomas Bair
Answered by attorney Hudson Thomas Bair (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Kapsack & Bair, LLP
It seems like two questions, if you have an attorney you should rely on the advice of counsel, if not, you should consider hiring an attorney. At your preliminary hearing you should not be asked about any pending charges unless you are actually sworn and testifying, and then, hopefully your attorney can keep that question from getting an answer. A skilled criminal defense attorney can help you.
It seems like two questions, if you have an attorney you should rely on the advice of counsel, if not, you should consider hiring an attorney. At your preliminary hearing you should not be asked about any pending charges unless you are actually sworn and testifying, and then, hopefully your attorney can keep that question from getting an answer. A skilled criminal defense attorney can help you.
Read More Read Less

What does it mean if a probable cause charge is filed but the judge doesn't sign it?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Austin M Hirschhorn (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Austin Hirschhorn, P.C.
It means that the judge was not satisfied with the prosecutors presentation and didn't believe there were enough facts to go ahead with the charge.
It means that the judge was not satisfied with the prosecutors presentation and didn't believe there were enough facts to go ahead with the charge.