Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLPPartner

no photo

About Lester C. Houtz

Lester C. Houtz is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, intellectual property litigation, antitrust and 2 other areas of law. Lester received a B.A. degree from Lebanon Valley College in 1973, and has been licensed for 37 years. Lester practices at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP in Denver, CO.

Reviews for Lester

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 4
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Antitrust
    • Securities Litigation
    • Corporate & Incorporation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    CASES TRIED OR OTHERWISE TAKEN TO JUDGMENT: Aeromexico v. de Prevoisin
    Represented defendants in a case alleging misappropriation of funds by the CEO of Aeromexico. The case was tried in Colorado state court in May 2008. Judgment for clients, affirmed on appeal.
    TIMET v. Globe
    Represented TIMET in a breach of contract case in Nevada state court against a raw material supplier who provided contaminated silicon for use in the manufacture of titanium metal. The case settled during trial in November 2005.
    Svoboda v. Bayer Corp.
    Represented Bayer in a personal injury case in Florida state court in March 2005 alleging that Alka Seltzer Plus caused a stroke. Jury verdict for Bayer.
    Hardy v. Bayer Corp.
    Represented Bayer in a personal injury case in Utah state court in February 2005 alleging that Alka Seltzer Plus caused a stroke. Jury verdict for Bayer.
    Schwartz v. QUALCOMM
    Represented QUALCOMM in an action brought in Colorado state court by 87 former employees alleging fraud
    breach of contract in connection with unvested stock options. Obtained dismissal or summary judgment as to 81 plaintiffs. Remaining plaintiffs settled before or during trial in January 2003.
    Wedel v. Colorado MEDtech
    Represented Colorado MEDtech in a case alleging securities fraud
    breach of contract in connection with plaintiff's sale of a medical device company to client in exchange for stock in client. The case went to arbitration for two weeks before JAG in Denver in October 2001. Ruling for client on all counts.
    Precor v. Life Fitness
    Represented Life Fitness in a dispute between two manufacturers of exercise treadmills. Precor claimed design patent infringement
    Life Fitness claimed utility patent infringement. Jury verdict rendered against client on both claims in U.S. District Court in Seattle in October 1999. On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed as to Precor's claim against Life Fitness.
    In re MAXXAM Shareholders Securities Litigation
    Represented plaintiffs in a shareholder derivative case concerning self-dealing transactions involving a real estate development project in Rancho Mirage, California. The case was tried in Delaware Chancery Court,
    in April 1997 the Court found liability against defendants. The case settled prior to a determination of damages.
    Kahn v. Tremont Corporation
    Represented defendants in a shareholder derivative suit challenging a related-party stock purchase transaction. The case was tried in Delaware Chancery Court in June 1995, with a decision in favor of clients on all claims. The case was reversed
    rem
    ed by the Delaware Supreme Court. The case settled in the course of the trial on rem
    in the Chancery Court.
    Sutrak Air Conditioning Sales Corp. v. Carrier Corp.
    Represented Carrier in antitrust
    patent-infringement case involving bus air conditioning systems. Partial summary judgment was granted in Carrier's favor dismissing the antitrust claims. Patent, trade dress,
    federal anti-dumping claims were tried in U.S. District Court in Denver in 1995. Jury verdict for Carrier on all claims.
    Walter v. Phillips Petroleum
    Represented Phillips in a case filed by a family burned in a home propane gas explosion. Phillips made the odorizing agent added to propane so people can smell a gas leak. The case was tried to a jury in U.S. District Court in Denver in 1992 after five other defendants had settled. Comparative fault verdict assigned 4% liability to Phillips.
    OTHER REPRESENTATIVE CASES: Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation (D. Mass.)
    Representing MassMutual in its actions under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, against underwriters Barclays, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs
    RBS, arising from their sales of residential mortgage-backed securities to MassMutual in 2005-2007.
    USG Wallboard Antitrust Litigation
    Represent defendant USG in class action
    opt-out antitrust cases in Philadelphia federal court.
    Flat Screen Antitrust Litigation/Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation
    Represented plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company in antitrust litigation against foreign computer component suppliers in federal court in San Francisco.
    In re Metropolitan Securities Litigation
    Represented defendant Ernst & Young in a class action case in Washington federal court bringing claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act.
    In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation
    Represented defendant Bayer CropScience in a class action case in Missouri federal court involving genetically modified rice.
    Seroquel Litigation
    Represented defendant AstraZeneca in various cases alleging personal injuries by users of Seroquel.
    Paskowitz v. Boulder Investment Advisers et al.
    Represented defendants in a class action case in Colorado federal court bringing claims under the Investment Company Act. Plaintiff sought damages
    an injunction against a proposed Rights Offering. Plaintiff dismissed his claims with prejudice.
    Vioxx Litigation
    Represented defendant Merck in various cases alleging heart attacks
    other personal injuries by users of Vioxx.
    AIMCO Litigation
    Represented AIMCO in various cases involving disputes over AIMCO's property insurance program for residential rental properties.
    Barnot v. Mercury Marine
    Lazo v. Mercury Marine
    Represented Mercury Marine in class actions in Texas
    Florida state courts brought by purchasers of OptiMax outboard engines. Plaintiffs alleged misrepresentation, breach of warranty,
    product defect. The cases settled.
    HEI v. Colorado MEDtech
    Represented Colorado MEDtech in case filed in U.S. District Court in Colorado. The case was filed in conjunction with a hostile takeover attempt,
    sought to invalidate the company's poison pill
    other bylaw provisions. Two follow-on shareholder class action suits were also filed in state court, alleging breach of fiduciary duty by the company's directors in resisting the HEI takeover attempt. All three suits were dismissed.
    In Re IntelCom Group, Inc. Securities Litigation
    Represented IntelCom Group, Inc.
    individual defendants in a federal securities fraud class action case in U.S. District Court in Colorado. Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants failed to disclose material information about a subsidiary's disbarment from federal government contracting. The case settled.
    In re Corporate Express Securities Litigation
    Represented director defendant in consolidated shareholder class action litigation challenging the merger of Corporate Express
    Buhrmann NV. The cases were filed in Colorado state court. Claims against client were dismissed.
    Mailers Data v. Siemens et al.
    Represented defendant NCR Corporation in a class action antitrust suit in Florida state court involving service of high-speed computer printers. Plaintiffs were independent service organizations, brokers,
    end-users. The case settled.
    Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings
    Represented defendants in class action securities fraud case in U.S. District Court in Colorado. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants failed to disclose material information concerning a contract with Perrier Corporation. The case settled.
    M Life Insurance Company v. Hoagl

    Represented dissenting former shareholders of an agent-owned re-insurance company in a corporate valuation case in state court in Denver. Clients disagreed with the company on the value of their shares following a merger,
    the parties engaged in a statutory appraisal proceeding to determine the fair value of the shares. The case settled prior to trial.
    Seinfeld v. Baroid Corp. et al.
    Represented the defendant directors of Baroid in a class action lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court challenging the merger of Baroid Corp.
    Dresser Industries. Plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their claims after defendants filed a motion to dismiss.
    TIMET v. Boeing
    Represented plaintiff in a suit in Colorado state court seeking over $600 million in damages for breach
    repudiation of a ten-year contract for the sale of titanium metal to Boeing. The case settled.
    StorMedia v. Maxtor
    Represented individual defendant in litigation in Colorado state court over a contract under which StorMedia was to supply rigid magnetic disks to Maxtor for use in disk drives. Both parties brought fraud
    contract claims against the other. Claims against client were dismissed.
    TIMET v. Elkem
    Represented plaintiff in a breach of contract
    warranty action in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh arising from defendant's supplying of contaminated raw materials (chromium powder) for use in the production of titanium metal. The case settled shortly before trial.
    Seinfeld v. Simmons
    Represented defendants in a shareholder derivative action in Chancery Court in Bergen County, New Jersey concerning a series of securities transactions. Plaintiff challenged the fairness of an open-market share repurchase program
    a Dutch auction self-tender offer. The case settled prior to trial.
    NL Industries v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. et al.
    Represented NL in an insurance coverage suit seeking a declaration of the insurance companies' liability for NL's environmental cleanup costs at over 200 sites nationwide. The case was pending in U.S. District Court in New Jersey
    settled before trial.
    Hermanson Family Limited Partnership v. Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
    Represented Ben & Jerry's in litigation filed in state court in Colorado relating to a Ben & Jerry's franchise shop in Denver. Plaintiff commercial real estate owner alleged that Ben & Jerry's wrongfully interfered with its commercial lease contract with a Ben & Jerry's franchisee. The case settled prior to trial.
    UCLA Faculty Disciplinary Proceeding
    Represented UCLA faculty member before the faculty Privilege
    Tenure Committee concerning charges of violating University regulations governing scientific research. The charges were dismissed pursuant to an agreement between the faculty member
    the University.
    Gould v. NL Industries
    Represented NL in a CERCLA contribution action filed in U.S. District Court in Portl
    , Oregon. NL was the former owner of a secondary lead smelter in Portl

    the other parties to the case were the subsequent owner of the smelter, neighboring property owners,
    suppliers of lead to the smelter. The case settled prior to trial.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1990, Colorado
    1989, Pennsylvania
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Pennsylvania Law School
    Class of 1988
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Lebanon Valley College
    Class of 1973
    B.A.

    University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 1985
    M.A.
    Political Science
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1951
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, December 6, 1951

Lester C. Houtz

Partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
Not yet reviewed

1899 Wynkoop StreetDenver, CO 80202U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kevin P. Gregory
Pro
Kevin P. Gregory
5.0
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Keith R. Olivera
Pro
Keith R. Olivera
4.5
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Eric Paul Accomazzo
Pro
Eric Paul Accomazzo
4.9
Commercial Litigation lawyer
James E. Gigax
Pro
James E. Gigax
4.4
Commercial Litigation lawyer
John C. Matthews
Pro
John C. Matthews
4.0
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: