×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPAssociate
no photo
Pro

Jennifer Bartlett

Not yet reviewed

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5200, Dallas, TX 75201

Litigation

About Jennifer Bartlett

Jennifer Bartlett litigates complex commercial and technology disputes across the country. She has represented clients in a variety of matters involving software in the AI, SaaS, health care, and cryptocurrency sectors, investor and computer fraud, failed private equity transactions, data security, trademark disputes, environmental actions, and regulatory issues. Jennifer has second-chaired two high-stakes preliminary injunction trials in the internet technology field involving multiple weeks of testimony across CFAA, Lanham Act, unfair competition, defamation, antitrust, and other related claims. She has defeated multiple motions for injunctive relief, prevailed on summary judgment resulting in the dismissal of all claims against clients, and argued motions to compel, to dismiss, and for reconsideration. Jennifer manages teams of lawyers on various matters to efficiently provide quality outcomes for clients. Jennifer has wide-ranging experience in both state and federal court, arbitration tribunals, administrative settings, and has handled appeals of district court and administrative decisions.

Concentrations

•Complex commercial litigation
•Computer fraud
•IP litigation
•Business disputes
•Class actions

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' Commercial Litigation, 2022-2026
•Listed, Super Lawyers Magazine, Texas Super Lawyers, 'Rising Stars,' 2022-2025

 

Jennifer Bartlett (Dallas, Texas) View website

Reviews for Jennifer

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Second-chaired week-long evidentiary hearing on cross motions for preliminary injunction in software access dispute in the healthcare industry.
    Second-chaired multi-week preliminary injunction evidentiary hearing in dispute related to cryptocurrency platform in federal court in Puerto Rico.
    Defeated back-to-back Temporary Restraining Orders in federal court in Wyoming
    Southern District of New York in less than a week.
    Litigating defamation
    trademark dispute involving founders of leading AI companies
    projects.
    Litigated case involving a variety of contractual
    tort claims. Primary responsibility for all briefing. Prevailed on summary judgment resulting in dismissal of claims.
    Manage multimillion-dollar products liability actions involving manufacturing
    packaging issues.
    Assisted in regulatory action before state agency for health care administration to respond to a certificate of need issued by the agency related to hospice facilities. Sole associate in litigation involving over $10MM of real property interests among multiple parties. Primary responsibility for all briefing. Prevailed on summary judgment resulting in dismissal of all claims.
    Sole associate in litigation involving a variety of contractual
    tort claims. Prevailed on summary judgment resulting in dismissal of claims.
    H
    led briefing
    hearing to overturn a default judgment. Prevailed on reconsideration.
    Briefed
    argued a motion to compel resulting in requested relief.
    Primary responsibility for all briefing for consolidated appeal from the United States Tax Court.
    H
    le significant briefing for environmental
    regulatory matters involving the Resource Conservation
    Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
    Liability Act,
    tort claims related to PFOS
    PFOA chemicals.
    Involved in a products liability action
    a partnership dispute related to a $345 million development project. Involved in extensive briefing
    second-chaired multi-day evidentiary hearing, resulting in successful outcome.
    The above representations were h
    led by Ms. Bartlett prior to her joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Government Experience: Executive Assistant to Cabinet Secretary, State of New Mexico Economic Development Department, 1998-2002
    Executive Assistant to Director, Allegheny County Economic Development Department, 1997-1998
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/b/bartlett-jennifer

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Texas
    New Mexico
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Dallas Women Lawyers Association, 2016-Present
    •Member, Dallas Bar Association, 2015-Present
    •Member, Dallas Association of Young Lawyers, 2015-Present

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 2015
    J.D.
    Editor-in-Chief, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal
    Other Education
    The College of Santa Fe
    Class of 2003
    B.A.

Email Jennifer Bartlett

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Jennifer Bartlett is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Jennifer Bartlett attended Georgetown University Law Center.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions