×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
James Douglas Colner

James Douglas Colner

Not yet reviewed

41 South High Street, Suite 2400, Columbus, OH 43215

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Commercial Litigation, Federal Court Litigation and 10 more

About James Douglas Colner

James Douglas Colner is a lawyer practicing alternative dispute resolution, commercial litigation, federal court litigation and 10 other areas of law. James received a B.A. degree from Ohio State University in 1975, and has been licensed for 47 years. James practices at Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP in Columbus, OH.

James Douglas Colner (Columbus, Ohio)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

James Douglas Colner got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for James

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Civil Rights
  • Personal Injury
  • Social Security
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Other 5
    • Federal Court Litigation
    • Product Liability
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Educational / Religious Organizations
    • Criminal Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Hope Academy v. White Hat Management, 2013 Ohio 931 (10th Dist. 2013) Trial Court discovery order compelling for-profit charter school operator to produce its internal financial records was upheld on appeal.
    Hope Academy v. White Hat Management, 2015 - Ohio - 3716 (Ohio Supreme Court 2015) Ohio Supreme Court rules for-profit operator of charter school owes fiduciary duties to school boards.
    Stephensen v. Guda (1995), Fourth Appellate District, 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 1032. Defense counsel for psychiatrist
    mental health clinic in medical malpractice trial. Verdict for defense upheld on appeal.
    S edgwick v. Kawasaki Cycleworks, Inc. (1991), 71 Ohio App. 3d 117. Counsel for plaintiff in products liability-motorcycle case. $783, 000.00 jury verdict upheld on appeal.
    Krieger Ford v. Chase Motors (1998), Tenth Appellate District, 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 1866. Counsel for plaintiff car dealership in fraud
    breach of contract action. Jury verdict for car dealership upheld on appeal.
    Weethee v. Boso (1989), Tenth Appellate District, 64 Ohio App. 3d 532. Defense counsel for City of Grove City in civil rights action. Directed verdict upheld on appeal.
    Gatchell v. Lawyer Title Insurance Corp. (1995), Tenth Appellate District, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 4140. Defense counsel for title insurance company with favorable decision upheld.
    Malik v. Central Ohio Disposal Co. (1989), No. 88AP-1169, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District, Franklin County, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 3689. Counsel for plaintiffs in motorcycle accident case. $704, 250.00-jury verdict upheld on appeal.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1979, Ohio
    1980, United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
    1980, United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit
    1982, United States Supreme Court
    1990, United States Court of Claims
    1979, Ohio State Courts
    Memberships

    Professional and Community Affiliations

    •Columbus Bar Association
    •Ohio State Bar Association
    •American Board of Trial Advocates
    •National Board of Trial Advocacy
    •National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys
    •Ohio Trial Lawyers Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Capital University Law School
    Class of 1979
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Ohio State University
    Class of 1975
    B.A.

James Douglas Colner

Partner at Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Not yet reviewed

Huntington Center, 41 South High Street, Suite 2400Columbus, OH 43215U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Mark Decker, Esq.
Pro
Mark Decker, Esq.
4.9
3
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
380-219-6513
View Profile
Brian G. Miller
Pro
Brian G. Miller
5.0
29
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer

Free Consultation

614-803-9948
View Profile
Andrew A. Zashin
Pro
Andrew A. Zashin
5.0
28
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
216-480-6023
View Profile
Amy M. McKinlay
Pro
Amy M. McKinlay
4.6
16
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
614-983-0871
View Profile
Adam Richard Huffman
Pro
Adam Richard Huffman
5.0
1
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
380-268-4657
View Profile

Email James Douglas Colner

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions