×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Ulmer & Berne LLPChair, Litigation Department; Co-Chair, Financial Services Industry Group
Michael Nathan Ungar

Michael Nathan Ungar

Not yet reviewed

1660 West 2nd Street, Suite 1100, Cleveland, OH 44113-1448

Banking & Commercial Litigation, Securities and Broker-Dealer Defense, Class Action Defense and 10 more

About Michael Nathan Ungar

Michael Nathan Ungar is a lawyer practicing banking & commercial litigation, securities and broker-dealer defense, class action defense and 10 other areas of law. Michael received a B.A. degree from Boston University in 1981, and has been licensed for 42 years. Michael practices at Ulmer & Berne LLP in Cleveland, OH.

Michael Nathan Ungar (Cleveland, Ohio)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Michael Nathan Ungar got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Michael

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy
  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility 1
    • Legal Malpractice
  • Other 11
    • Banking & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities and Broker-Dealer Defense
    • Class Action Defense
    • Defense of Shareholder and Derivative Claims
    • Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition
    • Corporate Control and Shareholder Disputes
    • SEC, NASD and NYSE Investigations
    • Contract Disputes
    • Trust Litigation
    • Business Acquisition Disputes
    • Partnership Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Chair, Litigation Department; Co-Chair, Financial Services Industry Group
    Firm Name
    Ulmer & Berne LLP

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Ohio
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio
    U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
    U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    U.S. District Court, Eastern Division of Wisconsin
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    Memberships
    Cleveland Metropolitan (Board of Trustees, 2007—
    Member: Executive Committee
    Court Rules Committee and Legislation Committee
    Chair, Judicial Selection Committee, 2005-2006
    Vice Chair, Judicial Selection Committee, 2002-2004
    Litigation Section, 1999
    Chair: Litigation Section, 2000-2001
    Litigation Institute, 1999), Ohio State (Member, Litigation Section) and American (Litigation Section
    Commercial and Banking Litigation and Business Torts Committee) Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Boston University School of Law
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Boston University
    Class of 1981
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1959
    June 5, 1959

Michael Nathan Ungar

Chair, Litigation Department; Co-Chair, Financial Services Industry Group at Ulmer & Berne LLP
Not yet reviewed

Skylight Office Tower1660 West 2nd Street, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113-1448U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Richard A. Cooper
Pro
Richard A. Cooper
4.6
1
Banking Law lawyer
216-939-5369
View Profile
John D. Sayre
Pro
John D. Sayre
5.0
1
Banking Law lawyer
440-596-5808
View Profile
Daniel Fredric Lindner
Pro
Daniel Fredric Lindner
4.7
22
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

216-202-2855
View Profile
James R. Chriszt
Pro
James R. Chriszt
5.0
1
Banking Law lawyer
216-939-5369
View Profile
Steven Howard Roth
Pro
Steven Howard Roth
5.0
12
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

216-706-9737
View Profile

Email Michael Nathan Ungar

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions