×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Mansour Gavin LPAPresident
Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne

Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne

Not yet reviewed

1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1400, Cleveland, OH 44114

Municipal Law, Zoning, Planning and Land Use, Eminent Domain and 4 more

About Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne

Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne is a lawyer practicing municipal law, zoning, planning and land use, eminent domain and 4 other areas of law. Anthony received a M.S. degree from Cleveland State University College of Urban Affairs in 1984, and has been licensed for 38 years. Anthony practices at Mansour Gavin LPA in Cleveland, OH.

Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne (Cleveland, Ohio)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Anthony

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Municipal Law
  • Zoning, Planning and Land Use
  • Eminent Domain
  • Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • Environmental Law
  • Other 1
    • Real Property

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    President
    Firm Name
    Mansour Gavin LPA
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Board of Trustees v. City of Painesville (6th Cir. 1999), 200 F.3d 396
    Court St. Dev. v. Stow City Council (9th Dist. 1998), 129 Ohio App.3d 359
    Danis Clarkco L
    fill Co. v. Trustees of German Twp., No. C-3-96-481, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21037 (S.D. Ohio December 15, 1997)
    Kishmarton v. William Bailey Constr., Inc. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 226
    Loreto Dev. Co. v. Village of Chardon (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1239
    Loreto Dev. Co. v. Village of Chardon (11th Dist. 1996), 119 Ohio App.3d 524
    City of Mentor v. Osborne, Nos. 98-L-226, 98-L-228, 98-L-229, 98-L-230, 201 Ohio App. LEXIS 2355 (11th Dist. May 25, 2001)
    Murray Energy Corp. v. City of Pepper Pike (8th Dist.), 2008-Ohio-2818
    City of North Olmsted v. North Olmsted L
    Holdings (8th Dist. 2000), 137 Ohio App.3d 1
    State ex rel. Michael Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights (2002), 96 Ohio St.3d 379
    Visconsi-Royalton, Ltd. v. City of Strongsville (8th Dist.), 2004-Ohio-4908.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1988, Ohio
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    Memberships
    Cleveland Metropolitan, Ohio State (Local Government Law Committee) and American (Member, Urban, State and Local Government Law and Eminent Domain Law Sections) Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Cleveland Marshall College of Law
    Class of 1988
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Cleveland State University College of Urban Affairs
    Class of 1984
    M.S.

    John Carroll University
    Class of 1982
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1960

Email Mr. Anthony Joseph Coyne

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions