About Tomas Linas Petkus

Tomas Petkus joined the firm in 1992. He pioneered the adaptation of computer technology to the practice of law, and is well known for integrating computers and digital technology and graphics with litigation.

Petkus conceived and applied the use of technology innovatively for effective and persuasive use in the courtroom. The earliest courtroom uses of bar coding, light pens, databases, digital depositions, imaging, digital videography and photography in the court room can be traced back to Petkus. Due to his innovations, Tobin, Petkus & Muñoz is widely known for its trial expertise and the use of technology to enhance those skills.

Tobin, Petkus & Muñoz have transformed the way in which trials are conducted, ensuring that the cases of their clients are clearly understood and are persuasive. In doing so, they have secured substantial courtroom victories, distinguishing them as among the country's top attorneys.

Tomas Petkus received his law degree from Chicago Kent College of Law where he was a member of the Moot Court Society and winner of the senior law student moot court competition. Since passing the bar, Petkus worked on computer and technology-related matters with the Chicago Bar Association. He is a past member and chair of the computer law office technology committee at the Chicago Bar Association and was also a member of the Association's Long Range Planning Committee. He spearheaded a project on electronic filing in the Circuit Court of Cook County. He has lectured widely on the use and adaptability of computers to the practice of law, including the annual Chicago Information Technology Show. He has received numerous recognitions and awards for services rendered to the bar. He graduated from the University of Illinois with honors. He is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association, Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, Chicago Bar Association, and Baltic Bar Association. Petkus speaks, reads, and writes Lithuanian.

Certified Legal Specialties

• Arbitration, Illinois Supreme Court, 1980

Representative Cases

• Prusis v. Hunter

Classes/Seminars

• Lecturer/Presenter, Computer and Technology, Chicago Bar Association, 1993 - 1994

Professional Associations and Memberships

• Chicago Bar Association, Chairman, Committee on Law Office Technology

• Illinois State Bar Association, Member

• Federal Bar Association, Member

• Baltic Bar Association, Member

• Chicago Computer Society, Member

 

Reviews for Tomas Linas

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Trial Practice

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Ithuanian
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Tobin & Muñoz, L.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Fegan v. Reid, 06 cv 6767, obtained a substantial seven figure verdict for a city traffic supervisor after a lengthy trial. Plaintiff was arrested by Reid, a police officer, because she could not 'fix' a parking ticket issued by her subordinate on his personal vehicle. Plaintiff sustained post traumatic stress disorder which became chronic. Reid also used excessive force causing serious physical injuries requiring surgery. In an effort to cover up his crimes Reid
    three other police officers fabricated a cover up. The defendants attempted to have plaintiff charged with felony aggravated battery on a police officer
    resisting to justify the arrest
    explain plaintiff's injuries. The other defendant officers were found guilty of conspiracy for the roles they played. Chicago Pizza, Inc. v. Pizza USA, Inc., 893 N.E.2d 985 (Ill., 2008) obtained relief from the appellate court which held plaintiff established willful violations of Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act warranting injunctive relief
    an award of attorney's fees. Monroe Capital, LLC, vs. CORE Business Credit, L.L.C., 08 L 36, successfully prosecuted a lawsuit against a former executive of plaintiff resulting in a substantial monetary settlement, an agreement by defendants to not compete
    to disgorge plaintiff's data. Plaintiff's former executive started a competing business with another competitor. Plaintiff alleged the executive misappropriated trade secrets, confidential data
    violated his employment agreement's provisions. Mejia v. Dominick, 07 cv 5923, successfully defended an elected official
    management employees accused of sexually harassing the plaintiff, an intern. The plaintiff ab
    oned her lawsuit resulting in its dismissal with prejudice. Evidence was developed showing plaintiff praised the accused supervisor's workplace conduct
    that she even expressed gratitude for the overwhelmingly positive experiences working for him. Alex
    er v. Sheraton, et. al., 04 L 5039, record setting result for the estate of a non-swimmer who could not be rescued before brain death because defendants' pool was open in violation of state safety statute
    Yakes v. Barber, 05 L 276, et. al., successfully represented estate of patient whose differentially diagnosed endocarditis was not investigated or treated for months resulting in premature death
    Monroe-Jefferson v. Korkis, et. al., 04 CH 2648, successfully defended lessee against l
    owner's claims of invalidity of a long term l
    lease
    Audio v. The Little Guys, Inc., 05 CH 10265, et. al., won dismissal of anti-trust
    business tort
    conspiracy claims
    Mearday v. City of Chicago, et al., Nos. 00 L 3227
    98 L 10983, successfully represented the victim of police misconduct
    conspiracy reaching a substantial settlement during trial
    Walker, et al. v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., et al., Nos. 210A990434, et. seq., successfully represented a substantial group of African-American employees who were the victims of racially based employment discrimination
    Touhy v. Simon, No. 83 P 10385, successfully represented the beneficiary of a trust who was victimized by her former trustee who breached his fiduciary duty
    obtained a substantial recovery of her losses
    damages
    Roberts v. Spears, et al., No. 02 L13204, successfully represented estate, widow
    child of patient who died due to medical negligence
    obtained a substantial settlement
    Shumway v. Imanage, No. 01 L 3350, successfully represented affected shareholder for claims arising from defendant's IPO
    obtained substantial settlement
    Busse v. UNUM Provident, et al., No. 98 L 11983, successfully represented a permanently disabled anesthesiologist in a substantial claim against his disability insurance carrier
    Berry, et al., v. Segal, et al., No. 02 CH 1595
    successfully represented prominent businessman
    owner of Near North National Group, Michael Segal, in a multi-million dollar racketeering
    defamation claim filed against him
    Nelson v. CoreComm, Ltd., et al., No. 99 L 7051, successfully represented plaintiff in case involving failure of corporation to recognize shares in connection with a merger
    McMahon v. DeJong, No. 99 L 646, obtained substantial settlement in a wrongful death medical malpractice claim for decedent's estate
    family
    Miller, et al. v. Endeavor Information Systems, et al., No. 00 L 7207, successfully represented plaintiffs' group in a large securities claim
    Brown, et al. v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al., No. 98VS1441870 (Georgia), successfully represented estate
    children of heavy equipment operator killed in crash in a wrongful death action
    Williams v. University of Illinois, et al., No. 98 L 10732, obtained a substantial settlement in wrongful death medical malpractice claim for a 66 year old male with kidney
    heart disease who died due to elective surgery
    Palka v. Cook County Hospital, et al., No. 97 L 14186, successfully represented plaintiff's estate
    adult children in a medical malpractice wrongful death claim
    Carpenter v. Nabong, No. 94 LA 83, obtained a record setting verdict in a medical malpractice action
    Swihart v. Blades Machinery Co., et al., No. 3:95-CV-605RM (Northern District Indiana), successfully defended manufacturer of grinding equipment in multimillion dollar suit by worker sustaining traumatic amputation
    Torretto v. I. B. Diffusion, L.P., No. 92 C 2758, obtained a not guilty judgment for a company
    its president against Title VII sexual harassment claim seeking eight million dollars alleging a hostile environment, sexual assaults
    attempted rape
    A. Munoz General Contractors, Inc. v. City of Chicago. No. 91 CH 1171, obtained a substantial judgment for a contractor in a major dispute with the City
    Netzky v. Prudential Securities, et al., No. 94-04918 (NASD Arbitration), judgment for a sophisticated investor against brokerage firm for losses sustained for trades not performed
    Moreno v. Barber Coleman Co., et al., 85 L 28175, obtained substantial settlement in wrongful death suit on behalf of estate, wife
    children of employee killed in a factory explosion. Concentration: Trial of Civil Matters.
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1980, U.S. Court of Appeals 7th Circuit
    1980, U.S. District Court Central District of Illinois
    1980, U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois
    1980, U.S. District Court Southern District of Illinois
    1980, Illinois
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Illinois
    Class of 1974
    B.A.
    with honors
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1952
    Chicago, Illinois, 1952

Contact Tomas Linas Petkus

Member at Tobin & Muñoz, L.L.C.
Not yet reviewed

Three First National Plaza70 W. Madison Street, Suite 1950Chicago, IL 60602U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 312-641-5220
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What is this attorney's primary practice area?
    The practice area Tomas Linas Petkus spends the most time on is Trial Practice.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Tomas Linas Petkus speaks Ithuanian.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Tomas Linas Petkus offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Tobin & Muñoz, L.L.C. has 5 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Tobin & Muñoz, L.L.C. was established in 1985.