Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLPPartner

no photo

About Mark L. Levine

Mark L. Levine is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, intellectual property litigation, patent infringement. Mark received a A.B. degree from Princeton University in 1986, and has been licensed for 36 years. Mark practices at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP in Chicago, IL.

Awards

Reviews for Mark

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent Infringement

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    CASES TRIED OR OTHERWISE TAKEN TO JUDGMENT: Gillette v. ShaveLogic (Mass. State Court)
    Trial counsel for ShaveLogic
    individually-named defendants, who were accused of misappropriating trade secrets
    confidential information from Gillette. ShaveLogic filed counterclaims for tortious interference, asserting that Gillette brought its claims not to protect any proprietary interests, but to interfere with ShaveLogic's business relationships. Court granted ShaveLogic's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all of Gillette's claims with prejudice,
    denied Gillette's motion for summary judgment on ShaveLogic's counterclaims.
    Read the WSJ article here.
    Read the Law360 article here.
    DuPont v. Unifrax
    Represented DuPont in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning fire barrier laminate for thermal blankets. Jury verdict for DuPont.
    Tyco v. Walsh
    Lead trial lawyer for Tyco in case against former director in connection with improper fees in SDNY. Adverse result at trial, reversed completely on appeal.
    Tyco v. Swartz
    Trial lawyer for Tyco in case against former CFO for improperly received compensation in SDNY. Obtained order in favor of Tyco after bench trial.
    ICU v. RyMed
    Lead trial lawyer for RyMed in patent lawsuit in two trials in Delaware. The first trial had mixed results,
    an inconsistent verdict on a key infringement issue. In the second trial, the jury found in favor of RyMed that there was no literal infringement of the relevant patent. Other issues are pending.
    Sensormatic v. The TAG Company US LLC et al.
    Lead trial lawyer for Sensormatic in patent
    trade secret trial in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida in August
    October 2008. Won bench trial on all claims. Affirmed on appeal.
    Schindler Elevator v. Otis Elevator
    Lead counsel for Otis in patent infringement lawsuit concerning elevator controls. Adverse result in jury trial, reversed on appeal. Judgment in favor of client.
    Carrier Class Action Litigation
    Lead counsel for Carrier in four consumer class-action lawsuits relating to secondary heat exchangers in furnaces manufactured by Carrier. Won Wisconsin case on summary judgment. Other lawsuits settled.
    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstr
    Corporation (D. Del. 2004)
    Lead trial counsel for United Technologies' Hamilton Sundstr
    division in patent infringement matter involving patents on methods for controlling surge in auxiliary power units used on large commercial airplanes. Hired to try case relating to Festo issue after case rem
    ed to trial court. Won complete defense judgment
    reversal of prior $46.5 million jury verdict. Affirmed by Federal Circuit
    cert. denied by U.S. Supreme Court.
    Honeywell $46.58 Million Jury Verdict Overturned
    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstr
    Corporation (D. Del. 2005)
    Lead trial counsel in successful defense of United Technologies' Hamilton Sundstr
    division in a patent infringement trial. Honeywell alleged that Hamilton Sundstr
    infringed a patent relating to the starting of an Auxiliary Power Unit for an airplane. Honeywell sought $135 million in damages (including interest
    treble damages). Jury verdict in client's favor, finding that Hamilton Sundstr
    did not infringe Honeywell's patent
    that the patent was invalid.
    Honeywell $46.58 Million Jury Verdict Overturned
    Elbex v. Sensormatic
    Lead counsel for Sensormatic in patent infringement case against Sensormatic. Won on summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Sensormatic. Largely affirmed on appeal by the Federal Circuit.
    Novartis Arbitration
    Co-lead counsel for Novartis in two-week ICC arbitration hearing.
    Elbex v. Tyco International
    Lead counsel for Tyco in patent infringement
    tortious interference case. The parties settled the patent claim. The Court dismissed the tortious interference claims against Tyco.
    Rolls Royce v. United Technologies
    Lead counsel for United Technologies in a patent interference lawsuit. First-chaired a three-day bench trial in December 2005. Lost at trial
    affirmed on appeal. Later patent infringement case by Rolls Royce on this technology won by United Technologies.
    Deloitte & Touche NCFE Litigation
    Represented Deloitte & Touche in lawsuits by bondholders against auditors
    financial institutions in connection with the issues that led to the bankruptcy of NCFE. The majority of the claims against Deloitte settled or were dismissed.
    Safeclick v. Visa International
    Represented Safeclick in patent infringement lawsuit relating to Verified by Visa system. Adverse summary judgment ruling.
    DuPont v. Merck
    First-chaired in a one-week arbitration hearing representing DuPont concerning royalties owed under agreement relating to Losartan anti-hypertension drug. Favorable ruling for DuPont.
    FTD v. Teleflora
    AFS
    First-chaired in a three-day arbitration hearing representing FTD against Teleflora
    AFS for breach of contract, in connection with minimum annual order fees due under agreements to provide access to FTD's Mercury Network. The arbitrator issued an award in favor of FTD.
    Bayer Corp. v. Carlsbad Technology
    Represented Bayer in its suit for patent infringement to enjoin other generic drug manufacturers from obtaining FDA approval to market
    sell a generic version of Bayer's antibiotic Cipro. Four-week trial on issue of obviousness. Won at trial.
    Bayer Corp. v. Schein Pharmaceutical, et al.
    Represented Bayer in its suit for patent infringement to enjoin generic drug manufacturers from obtaining FDA approval to market
    sell a generic version of Bayer's antibiotic Cipro. Won case on summary judgment motion. Affirmed on appeal.
    Rheox, Inc. v. Entact, Inc.
    Represented Rheox, Inc. in patent case involving method to remediate soil contamination. Adverse Markman hearing ruling.
    Board of Trustees of City Colleges v. Arthur Andersen
    Represented Arthur Andersen in litigation relating to derivative securities trading. Obtained partial summary judgment as to most of plaintiff's damages claim, case settled thereafter.
    Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation v. United Technologies Corporation
    Represented Pratt & Whitney unit of United Technologies in antitrust litigation claiming Pratt & Whitney monopolized jet engine parts aftermarket. 16-week jury trial. State Court (San Antonio, Texas). Chromalloy represented by Weil, Gotshal (New York). Jury verdict for Pratt & Whitney. Chromalloy takes nothing. Affirmed on appeal.
    Haney v. CRL Industries
    Patent infringement case involving industrial s
    ers. Represented defendant CRL in federal court in Portl
    , Oregon. Jury verdict on damages for CRL. Advisory jury verdict on invalidity favored Haney.
    Cline, et al. v. Gerrity Oil & Gas Company
    Represented Gerrity Oil
    individual officers
    directors in securities fraud class action arising out of alleged nondisclosure of information relating to reserves
    production. Case settled favorably after argument on dispositive motions.
    Whirlpool Financial Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co., et al.
    Represented W.R. Grace in securities fraud action relating to acquisition financing transaction. Case won below
    affirmed on appeal.
    O'Connell, et al. v. Continental Can Co.
    Represented Continental Can Co. in ERISA complaint. Dismissed by trial court
    affirmed by Seventh Circuit.
    OTHER REPRESENTATIVE CASES: Onyx v. Bayer
    Trial counsel for Bayer in breach of contract lawsuit concerning anti-cancer compound. Case settled in middle of trial in N.D. California.
    MANA v. DuPont
    Lead counsel for DuPont in patent infringement lawsuit concerning pesticide. Case settled.
    Tyco Healthcare v. C.R. Bard
    Co-lead counsel for Tyco Healthcare in patent infringement lawsuit concerning device used in hernia repair surgery. Case settled.
    Medline Arbitration
    Lead counsel for Medline in arbitration concerning purchase of a business. Case settled.
    Tyco ERISA Litigation
    Lead counsel for Tyco in ERISA lawsuit in connection with fall in stock price in 2002. Case settled.
    Schindler Elevator v. Otis Elevator (D.N.J.)
    Lead counsel for Otis in patent infringement lawsuit concerning belts used on elevators. Case pending.
    Rembr
    t v. ADT et al.
    Lead counsel for ADT in patent infringement lawsuit filed against multiple defendants in the Eastern District of Virginia relating to high-speed dial-up modems. Defendant settled.
    Brazen v. Tyco International
    Represented Tyco in securities law claim relating to registration statement issued by Tyco in connection with the merger with Mallinckrodt. Case settled.
    DuPont v. Cardinal Health
    Represented DuPont in case for breach of contract
    promissory estoppel relating to DuPont's business that makes fabric for surgical drapes
    gowns. Case settled just before trial with settlement worth over eight figures.
    3Com Corp. v. Cambia Networks
    Represented 3Com against Cambia Networks in trade secrets misappropriation
    breach of contract case involving 3G wireless technology. Case settled.
    Coleman Holdings v. Arthur Andersen
    Represented Andersen in negligence
    fraud action in connection with Andersen's audit of Sunbeam. Case settled.
    DuPont v. Dyneon
    Represented DuPont in patent infringement action against Dyneon subsidiary of 3M. Case settled prior to Markman hearing.
    Sportvision, Inc. v. Princeton Video Image, Inc.
    Represented Princeton Video Image, Inc. in patent case concerning insertion of video images, such as billboards
    first & ten line, into live broadcasts. Case settled.
    Siemens Canada, Ltd. v. Lectron Products, Inc.
    Represented Siemens Canada in patent litigation concerning electronically controlled fuel vapor management valve technology. Case settled.
    Johnson Products Co. v. Pro-Line Corporation
    Represented plaintiff Johnson Products in federal court in Chicago. Patent infringement litigation involving chemical compositions used in hair treatment products. After evidentiary Markman hearing, all patent claim interpretation issues resolved favorably to client. Case settled on favorable terms.
    Gas Turbine Contract Litigation
    Represented Pratt & Whitney in Paris commercial arbitration against Korean company.
    Brantman et al. v. MFS Communications Co., et al.
    Represented MFS Communications Co. in securities fraud lawsuit. Settled favorably on second day of trial.
    Figgie International, Inc. v. Crown Beverage Packaging Inc., et al.
    Represented Continental Can Company, Inc. in dispute concerning asset purchase agreement as responsibility for clean-up of plants. Settled favorably on first day of trial.
    DuPont Arbitration
    Represented DuPont in arbitration relating to non-compete clause. Case settled prior to hearing.
    Sound Solution, L.P., et al. v. United Technologies Corporation, et al.
    Represented Pratt & Whitney in antitrust lawsuit. Case settled prior to trial.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1990, Illinois
    1990, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    1999, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    2000, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Yale Law School
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Princeton University
    Class of 1986
    A.B.
    summa cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1964
    Chicago, Illinois, December 20, 1964

Mark L. Levine

Partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
Not yet reviewed

Courthouse Place, 54 West Hubbard StreetChicago, IL 60654U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Sheryl A. Fyock
Pro
Sheryl A. Fyock
4.4
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Daniel John Voelker
Pro
Daniel John Voelker
4.5
Commercial Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Joseph Casciato
Pro
Joseph Casciato
5.0
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Jeffrey Kulwin
Pro
Jeffrey Kulwin
4.8
Commercial Litigation lawyer
Eric J. Parker
Pro
Eric J. Parker
5.0
Commercial Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: