×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
Callie Sand
Pro

Callie Sand

Not yet reviewed

77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100, Chicago, IL 60601

Intellectual Property & Technology and Intellectual Property Litigation

About Callie Sand

Callie Sand is a skilled intellectual property attorney with a strong focus on litigation, offering clients comprehensive legal support through every phase of their IP disputes. She has litigated disputes in district courts, before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and the U.S. International Trade Commission. Callie has deep experience managing the entire litigation process, from pre-suit investigation and discovery to trial and appeals, aiming to provide her clients with strategic, results-driven representation.

Callie’s in-depth knowledge of patent law is complemented by her experience in trademark and trade secret litigation, providing clients with well-rounded counsel to protect their intellectual property across multiple fronts. Her diverse practice spans a range of industries, including consumer electronics, medical devices, consumer goods, semiconductors, and software. As a registered patent attorney, she leverages her technical proficiency and legal acumen to help clients navigate complex patent matters and safeguard their innovations.

Concentrations

•Patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret litigation
•Inter partes review and other post-grant proceedings at the U.S. PTO
•Client counseling in all areas of intellectual property

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' 2021-2024
•Litigation - Intellectual Property, 2021-2024
•Intellectual Property Law, 2022-2024
•Patent Law, 2024
•Listed, Leading Lawyers, 'Emerging Lawyers,' 2024-2025

 

Callie Sand (Chicago, Illinois) View website

Reviews for Callie

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 2
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Intellectual Property Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Representation of major electronics
    telecommunications company in the defense of a patent infringement action involving wireless communication technology. Court granted summary judgment of no willful infringement
    noninfringement based on patent exhaustion
    a settlement without trial.
    Representation of major electronics
    telecommunications company in ITC action involving in investigation involving television remote controls. ALJ found the patent invalid as indefinite prior to hearing.
    Representation major airline in trade secret case involving one of its competitors. Parties settled shortly before trial.
    Representation of major electronics company in various patent infringement matters in ED Texas involving cellular technology.
    Representation of major computer manufacturer in various patent infringement matters in ED Texas
    WD Texas.
    Representation of major airline in various patent, copyright,
    trademark cases.
    Representation of major cloud infrastructure company in patent infringement case involving network technology. Parties settled before trial.
    Representation of sporting goods company in enforcing
    defending patents relating to protective helmets. Parties settled after trial.
    Representation of tools company in the defense of a patent infringement action involving laser marking technology. Parties settled without trial.
    Representation of baby toys company in multiple patent
    trademark matters.
    Representation of medical device company in multi-patent litigation in D. Delaware.
    Representation of defendant in ED Texas case involving a patent analysis system. Obtained claim construction order finding all claims indefinite.
    Representation of defendant in the defense of a patent infringement action involving display organization software. Court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
    Representation of power tools company in the defense of a patent infringement action involving battery technology. Parties settled before trial.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.gtlaw.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Illinois
    California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
    U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan Law School
    Class of 2013
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Carleton College
    Class of 2010
    B.A.
    Physics, magna cum laude

Email Callie Sand

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Callie Sand is admitted to practice in California and Illinois.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Callie Sand is admitted to practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States District Court for the Southern District of California and United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Callie Sand attended University of Michigan Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions