×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPAttorney
no photo

Ms. Corby Cochran Anderson

Not yet reviewed

214 N. Tryon St., Ste. 3700, Charlotte, NC 28202

Intellectual Property Litigation, Employees and Technology, Litigation and 10 more

About Ms. Corby Cochran Anderson

Ms. Corby Cochran Anderson is a lawyer practicing intellectual property litigation, employees and technology, litigation and 10 other areas of law. Corby received a B.A. degree from College of William & Mary in 1976, and has been licensed for 32 years. Corby practices at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP in Charlotte, NC.

Ms. Corby Cochran Anderson (Charlotte, North Carolina)

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Corby

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 12
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Employees and Technology
    • Business Disputes
    • Privacy
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Retail
    • Technology Disputes and Litigation
    • E-Commerce
    • Data & Intellectual Assets
    • Franchise
    • Trademark Infringement
    • Antitrust & Trade Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Notable: Corby's representative experience includes: Represent multinational electronic
    telecommunications companies in patent litigation over mobile device connectivity technology
    Represent a leading online lending exchange in intellectual property
    litigation matters, including patent litigation involving methods
    computer networks for coordinating loans over the internet
    Represent various national franchisors in federal courts in North Carolina seeking injunctive relief against franchisees for trademark infringement
    related claims
    Represent an investment management company in trademark litigation in Delaware federal court
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Defended a franchisor in a nationwide class action over the administration of franchise advertising funds
    Represented a national software company in litigation against a prospective business partner involving copyright
    trade secret disputes related to performance measurement software in health care
    Defended a NASCAR Sprint Cup Series driver in opposition proceedings at the Trademark Trial
    Appeal Board brought by a national manufacturer of snowboarding products
    Defended a national provider of waste management services in a class action in North Carolina Business Court involving contract claims
    Represented an international power plant manufacturer in a fraud
    breach of contract dispute in federal court in Florida over the construction of a power plant in Pakistan
    Defended a Southeastern grocery chain in a lawsuit in federal court in Texas filed by a company that provided mystery shopper services, alleging copyright infringement
    theft of trade secrets
    Defended an Indiana-based insurer in class action litigation in federal court in South Carolina over the calculation of insurance benefits
    Represented a major financial institution seeking to halt a competitor's trademark infringement in nationally televised bankcard commercials
    Represented a Jordan-based manufacturer
    distributor of Middle Eastern foods
    its North Carolina affiliate in a trademark, trade dress,
    false advertising lawsuit against an Illinois distributor
    Defended a major motion picture distributor in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by an author who claimed his manuscript was the basis for the movie He Got Game
    Represented a niche-market maker of canine treats in a federal lawsuit to enforce its trademark rights against a major manufacturer of pet products
    Represented a Kansas-based cooling tower manufacturer in a federal lawsuit in Florida involving trademark infringement
    business defamation disputes with a competitor based in Calcutta, India
    Defended a general partner in a class action over the syndication of limited partnerships in the cable television industry

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Certified North Carolina Superior Court Mediator
    1994, North Carolina
    U. S. Court of Federal Claims
    U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Memberships

    Civic & Professional Memberships

    •Mecklenburg County Bar - Board of Directors (2003-2006)
    Bar Leadership Institute (2003)
    Publications, CLE and Centennial Committees (former member)
    •North Carolina Bar Association - Committee on Trademarks, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets, IP Section
    Committee on Franchising, Business Law Section
    Appellate Rules Study Committee (former member)
    •American Bar Association - The Franchise Lawyer, Editor-in-Chief
    Franchise Law Journal, Editorial Board (former member)
    First Amendment and Media Litigation Committee (former member)
    •North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys
    •University of North Carolina at Charlotte - College of Arts & Sciences Advisory Council (former member)
    •Kids Voting North Carolina - Board of Directors
    •Kids Voting Mecklenburg County - Board of Directors (former member)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Other Education
    College of William & Mary
    Class of 1976
    B.A.
    magna cum laude

Email Ms. Corby Cochran Anderson

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions