Lenczner SlaghtPartner

Paul-Erik Veel

About Paul-Erik Veel

Paul-Erik Veel is a lawyer practicing appeals, arbitration, class actions and 6 other areas of law. Paul-Erik received a B.A. degree from McGill University in 2006, and has been licensed for 16 years. Paul-Erik practices at Lenczner Slaght in Toronto, ON.

Reviews for Paul-Erik

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration
  • Class Actions
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 5
    • Appeals
    • Competition
    • Product Liability
    • Professional Liability and Regulation
    • Public and Administrative

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Lenczner Slaght
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Cases: Toronto District School Board v SAP Canada Inc.
    Counsel to the Toronto District School Board in an action relating to the implementation of an SAP software system.
    Andrew Skodyn, Margaret Robbins & Paul-Erik Veel April 30, 2018
    ES v Joannou
    Counsel to a psychiatrist in an appeal raising the novel issue of the jurisdiction of the Consent
    Capacity Board to grant remedies under the Charter of Rights
    Freedoms. Successfully responded to the appeal.
    Paul-Erik Veel & Danielle Glatt August 17, 2017
    Cardinal v Clevel
    Indians Baseball Company
    Counsel for Douglas Cardinal in proceedings to restrain the use in Canada of the Clevel
    baseball team's name
    logo on human rights grounds.
    Monique Jilesen, Rebecca Jones, Paul-Erik Veel, Margaret Robbins & Laurel D. Hogg June 30, 2017
    Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Inc v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
    Counsel to Subway in a $210 million defamation action against the CBC
    others relating to a Marketplace episode.
    Sana Halwani, William C. McDowell, Paul-Erik Veel & Brendan F. Morrison March 6, 2017
    Cygnus Electronics Corporation v Hitachi AIC Inc
    Counsel to a defendant electronics company in a proposed Ontario class action relating to allegations of price-fixing in the market for electrolytic capacitors.
    Tom Curry, Monique Jilesen & Paul-Erik Veel June 4, 2016
    Atos Inc v Sapient Canada Inc
    Counsel to Atos in a dispute respecting the termination of a subcontract for data conversion
    software support. The matter was subject to numerous motions
    proceeded to a five week trial before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, where Atos was successful in recovering approximately $5.5 million in damages.
    Peter Griffin, Shara N. Roy, Paul-Erik Veel, Laurel D. Hogg & Grace Tsakas May 18, 2016
    Rayner v McManus
    Counsel to a physician in a proceeding alleging liability to a non-patient in respect of statements made by the physician to another individual.
    Paul-Erik Veel & Sam Johansen May 16, 2016
    Pharmascience Inc v Pfizer Canada Inc
    Counsel to Pfizer in an action for damages under section 8 of the PM(NOC) Regulations relating to Lyrica (pregabalin), a neuropathic pain drug.
    Tom Curry, Monique Jilesen & Paul-Erik Veel April 18, 2016
    Conference des juges de paix magistrats du Quebec v Quebec (Attorney General)
    Counsel to the intervener Association of Justices of the Peace of Ontario in an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding judicial compensation.
    Tom Curry & Paul-Erik Veel July 2, 2015
    DBDC Spadina Ltd v Walton
    Counsel to a series of companies in proceedings involving a receivership over commercial real estate developments
    efforts to recover $110 million in funds improperly diverted. The matter involved dozens of contested motions
    several appeals on a variety of commercial, real estate issue
    construction law issues.
    Peter Griffin, Shara N. Roy, Paul-Erik Veel, Danielle Glatt & Madison Robins May 24, 2015
    Lawrence v Thornton
    Counsel to majority shareholders in an oppression
    misfeasance claim against a minority shareholder
    former director of a company involving residential leasing.
    Paul-Erik Veel May 7, 2015
    Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc
    Counsel to Pfizer in an action for damages under section 8 of the PM(NOC) Regulations relating to Lyrica (pregabalin), a neuropathic pain drug. The action proceeded to a five-week trial.
    Tom Curry, Monique Jilesen, Paul-Erik Veel & James S.S. Holtom January 1, 2015
    Angus v The Corporation of the Municipality of Port Hope
    Counsel to the applicants in proceedings to enforce a trust in favour of municipal ratepayers.
    Alan J. Lenczner & Paul-Erik Veel May 20, 2014
    University of Toronto v AW
    Counsel to a student in university discipline proceedings relating to an alleged breach of the Student Code of Conduct pertaining to alleged sexual misconduct.
    Paul-Erik Veel May 14, 2014
    Inquest into the Death of Robert Clause
    Counsel to a physician in a Coroner's Inquest relating to a death in the Brantford jail.
    Paul-Erik Veel February 12, 2014
    Rosen v BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc
    Counsel to BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. in an overtime class action brought by a former investment advisor on behalf of all BMO NBI investment advisors in Ontario.
    Peter Griffin, Monique Jilesen, Paul-Erik Veel & Constanza Pauchulo January 21, 2014
    Commissioner of Competition v Rogers Communications Inc
    Counsel to the Commissioner of Competition in proceedings against Rogers Communications Inc.
    Chatr Wireless Inc. relating to misleading advertising under the Deceptive Marketing Practices provisions of the Competition Act. The application involved successful defence to a constitutional challenge to certain provisions of the Competition Act brought by the respondents.
    Tom Curry, Jaan Lilles, Paul-Erik Veel & Grace Tsakas November 30, 2012
    Commercial Arbitration
    Counsel to a mining company in an arbitration regarding liability
    indemnification for historical environmental contamination.
    Ronald G. Slaght, Shara N. Roy & Paul-Erik Veel August 6, 2011
    Austin v Overs
    Counsel to the defendant in an action relating to an alleged oral agreement for shares in Pizza Pizza.
    Monique Jilesen & Paul-Erik Veel June 3, 2011
    R v Beszterczey
    Counsel to an individual in a four week jury trial of first-degree murder charge.
    Paul-Erik Veel June 3, 2001
    K
    avel v City of Toronto
    Counsel to an individual seeking election to a school board in connection with an application under the Municipal Elections Act.
    Paul-Erik Veel May 13, 2001
    Kraayeveld v Taekwondo Canada
    Counsel to an athlete in a successful arbitration before the Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada relating to the denial of funding under the Athlete Assistance Program.
    Paul-Erik Veel & Laura Robinson May 10, 2001
    Elliot Lake Commission of Inquiry
    Counsel to a witness physician involved in rescue efforts following the collapse of a mall in Elliot Lake in connection with a public inquiry into the mall collapse.
    Paul-Erik Veel April 2, 2001
    Ramsay v Panasonic Corporation
    Counsel to a defendant electronics company in a proposed British Columbia class action relating to allegations of price-fixing in the market for capacitors.
    Tom Curry, Monique Jilesen & Paul-Erik Veel March 10, 2001
    R v Sztejnmiler
    Stoll
    Counsel to a bar owner charged with manslaughter arising in connection with a fatal highway accident after a patron's consumption of alcohol at the bar. The Crown alleged that the act of over-serving alcohol to the driver of the vehicle prior to the accident constituted criminal negligence causing death, notwithst
    ing that the accused was in no way involved in the act of driving. In a case which raised novel issues in the law of manslaughter, the accused was successfully discharged following a preliminary inquiry. The decision was upheld by the Superior Court of Justice.
    William C. McDowell & Paul-Erik Veel February 7, 2001
    Li Preti v Compliance Audit Committee of the City of Toronto
    Counsel to electors in successful proceedings before the City of Toronto Compliance Audit Committee to commence a compliance audit of election campaign finances
    prosecution of a former city councillor.
    Paul-Erik Veel December 26, 2000
    Southcott Estates Inc v Toronto Catholic District School Board
    Counsel for appellant/respondent on cross-appeal, Southcott Estates Inc., on an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the duty to mitigate losses
    the availability of the remedy of specific performance in a breach of contract action.
    Read Lexpert's Significant Matters summary.
    Tom Curry & Paul-Erik Veel December 24, 2000
    Depoe v Mammoliti
    Counsel to the elector in successful proceedings before the City of Toronto Compliance Audit Committee to commence a compliance audit of election campaign finances
    prosecution of a sitting city councillor.
    Paul-Erik Veel December 17, 2000
    Adams v Association of Professional Engineers
    Counsel on an application for judicial review seeking to quash a decision of the Council of Professional Engineers of Ontario to accept the resignation of a member of Council.
    Paul-Erik Veel December 13, 2000
    Ontario (Attorney General) v Lee
    Counsel for the appellant in an appeal relating to the forfeiture of a house under the Civil Remedies Act.
    Tom Curry & Paul-Erik Veel October 26, 2000
    Khaiter v Human Rights Tribual of Ontario
    Counsel for the Ombudsman of Ontario successfully opposing a motion to be added as a party to an application for judicial review.
    Tom Curry & Paul-Erik Veel October 24, 2000
    R v B(B)
    Counsel to a youth charged with sexual assault. The youth was acquitted following a trial.
    Paul-Erik Veel October 23, 2000
    Sheridan v Goldstone Resources Inc
    Counsel to the plaintiff in an action for wrongful termination of a consulting services agreement.
    Paul-Erik Veel October 22, 2000
    R v Beitel
    Counsel to a physician in a successful Charter application to exclude evidence seized in contravention of the accused's right to be free from unreasonable search
    seizure. The application involved the application of constitutional principles to the search of internet service providers
    psychiatric offices.
    Jaan Lilles & Paul-Erik Veel October 14, 2000
    Mackie Research Capital Corporation v Mackie
    Counsel for the plaintiffs in a dispute relating to the departure of investment advisors.
    Matthew Sammon & Paul-Erik Veel September 21, 2000
    Ontario Securities Commissioner v Sbaraglia
    Counsel to creditors of a company on a receivership application brought by the Ontario Securities Commission.
    Paul-Erik Veel September 17, 2000
    Indcondo Building Corporation v Rinomato
    Counsel for a defendant in a fraudulent conveyance action. Successfully moved to set aside an ex parte Mareva injunction.
    Dena N. Varah & Paul-Erik Veel September 2, 2000

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Ontario
    Memberships

    Associations

    •Canadian Bar Association

    •Ontario Bar Association - Member-At-Large of the Civil Litigation and Health Law Executives

    •The Advocates' Society

    •American Bar Association - Litigation and Antitrust Law Sections

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Toronto
    Class of 2009
    J.D.
    Other Education
    McGill University
    Class of 2006
    B.A.
    Economics and Political Science

    McGill University
    Class of 2006
    B.A.
    Honours

    University of Toronto
    Class of 2009
    M.A.
    Economics

Paul-Erik Veel

Partner at Lenczner Slaght
Not yet reviewed

130 Adelaide St W, Suite 2600Toronto, ON M5H 3P5Canada

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Salvatore Caramanna
Pro
Salvatore Caramanna
3.8
Criminal Law lawyer
John McLeish
Pro
John McLeish
5.0
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

John McLeish
Pro
John McLeish
5.0
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

Matthew A. Friedberg
Pro
Matthew A. Friedberg
4.7
Criminal Law lawyer
John McLeish
Pro
John McLeish
5.0
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: