×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPSenior Associate
Hugh Arthur Meighen

Hugh Arthur Meighen

Not yet reviewed

22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, ON M5H 4E3

International Trade and Investment, International Arbitration and Domestic Commercial Arbitration

About Hugh Arthur Meighen

Hugh Arthur Meighen is a lawyer practicing international trade and investment, international arbitration, domestic commercial arbitration. Hugh received a A.B. degree from Princeton University in 2005, and has been licensed for 16 years. Hugh practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Toronto, ON.

Hugh Arthur Meighen (Toronto, Ontario)

Reviews for Hugh

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • International Trade and Investment
    • International Arbitration
    • Domestic Commercial Arbitration

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Associate
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Successfully defended a consortium of Korean EPC contractors in an ICC arbitration seated in Toronto over the construction of a coal-fired power plant, resulting in a favourable multi-million dollar award
    Representing an international joint venture in a multimillion dollar ICC arbitration over the construction of a mine in Central America, resulting in a positive settlement
    Representing Canadian
    South American parties in the defence of an ICC claim arising from a series of guarantees, resulting in a positive settlement
    Representing an aerospace
    telecommunications company in a dispute with an English satellite telecommunications company under the LCIA Rules, resulting in a positive settlement
    Successfully representing a Canadian mining company in the successful recognition
    enforcement of a $1 billion ICSID (AF) arbitral award in Ontario
    Successfully advising a consortium of companies in the successful recognition
    enforcement of a multimillion dollar award in Ontario courts
    Representing a Canadian software developer in a programming dispute with an Eastern European/American vendor under the ICDR Arbitration Rules
    Representing a telecommunications company in an investment dispute with a Middle Eastern government under the UNCITRAL Rules
    Representing a consortium of Asian
    African contractors in DIAC arbitration over the construction
    finishing works of a major international airport in the Middle East
    Representing a Turkish contractor in DIAC proceedings over the construction of a high-rise residential tower
    Advising a Japanese entity in relation to a sale
    purchase agreement in the Middle East
    Advising an international defence contractor in connection with a potential ICC dispute over a project in a Middle Eastern country
    Advising a consortium of oil & gas companies in a revenue-sharing dispute with a state-owned petroleum company
    Advising a state-owned oil & gas company in a dispute with its European partner in a dispute over a sales
    distribution agreement


    Acting as sole arbitrator in a real property dispute
    procurement disputes.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Ontario
    2011, New York
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Member, Law Society of Upper Canada
    •Member, ICC Canada

    Community Involvement

    •Board Member, Homes First Foundation
    •Board Member, TRM Family Foundation

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Princeton University
    Class of 2005
    A.B.
    cum laude

    McGill University
    B.C.L. / LL.B.

    McGill University
    2009 Dean's List

Hugh Arthur Meighen

Senior Associate at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

Bay Adelaide Centre, East Tower22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400Toronto, ON M5H 4E3Canada

Email Hugh Arthur Meighen

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions