×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPSenior Associate
Patrick Trent

Patrick Trent

Not yet reviewed

1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900, Montreal, QC H3B 5H4

Labour and Employment, Healthcare Human Resources and Labour Relations, Health Law and 1 more

About Patrick Trent

Patrick Trent is a lawyer practicing labour and employment, healthcare human resources and labour relations, health law and 1 other area of law. Patrick received a B.A. degree from University of Ottawa in 1998, and has been licensed for 22 years. Patrick practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Montreal, QC.

Patrick Trent (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Patrick

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labour and Employment
  • Other 3
    • Healthcare Human Resources and Labour Relations
    • Health Law
    • Education

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Associate
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Represented A&D Prevost in a collective agreement interpretation grievance: Maxime Larouche/Gaetan Heroux/Metallurgistes Unis d'Amerique section locale 9414
    A&D Prevost Inc., (2013), decision by Jean-Guy Clement, grievance arbitrator.
    Represented the McGill University Health Centre in the context of a wrongful termination grievance: Madame Marie-Geralda Malivert/Syndicat des employe(es) du Centre universitaire de sante McGill
    le Centre universitaire de sante McGill, (2012), decision by Jean-Guy Clement, grievance arbitrator.
    Represented a large employer in a workers' compensation claim before the Commission des lesions professionnelles. The employee's claim for workers' compensation benefits on account of her depression was denied: M. P.
    Compagnie A, (2012 QCCLP 6017), decision by Margaret Cuddihy.
    Represented a lawyer in the context of an unjust dismissal complaint before the Commission des relations du travail
    in a subsequent application for judicial review by the former employer: Marie-Claude Caron
    Robert Daigneault, Cabinet d'avocats, (2009 QCCRT 0290), Marie-Claude Caron
    Robert Daigneault, Cabinet d'avocats, (2011 QCCRT 0008)
    Robert Daigneault, Cabinet d'avocats
    Marie-Claude Caron, (2012), Superior Court of Quebec
    Represented Motos Jean-Francois Hamel Ltee in the context of an unjust dismissal complaint by a former employee before the Commission des relations du travail: Sylvie Beliveau
    Motos Jean-Francois Hamel Ltee, (2011 QCCRT 0308), decision by Alain Turcotte.
    Represented McGill University in the context of an interpretation grievance: L'union des employes de service, Local 800, F.T.Q.
    Universite McGill, (2011), decision by Maureen Flynn, grievance arbitrator.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, Québec
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Member, Canadian Bar Association

    Community Involvement

    •Board member, MAB Mackay Rehabilitation Centre, 2012-present
    •Co-Chair, BLG Pedal for Kids, 2012-present
    •Member and Vice-Chair, La Dauphinelle (shelter for battered women), 2007-12
    •Member and Chair of the Board, Sedbergh School, 2009-11
    •Former Executive Director, McGill Legal Information Clinic, 2001-03

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    University of Ottawa
    Class of 1998
    B.A.
    Political Science & History

    McGill University
    Class of 2003
    B.C.L./LL.B.

Patrick Trent

Senior Associate at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900Montreal, QC H3B 5H4Canada

Email Patrick Trent

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions