×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawPartner
Lindsey Miller

Lindsey Miller

Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3

Aboriginal, Bankruptcy + Insolvency, Class Actions and 8 more

About Lindsey Miller

Lindsey Miller is a lawyer practicing aboriginal, bankruptcy + insolvency, class actions and 8 other areas of law. Lindsey received a degree from University of Alberta in 2002, and has been licensed for 18 years. Lindsey practices at Field Law in Edmonton, AB.

Lindsey Miller (Edmonton, Alberta)

Reviews for Lindsey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • Other 8
    • Aboriginal
    • Bankruptcy + Insolvency
    • Collections, Bankruptcy + Insolvency
    • Condominium
    • Corporate + Business Disputes
    • Finance + Banking
    • Indigenous
    • Privacy + Data Management

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: Graham Group Ltd v. Labas Estate 2017 ABQB 241 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2017
    1536466 Alberta Ltd v. Prestigious Properties Inc. 2017 ABQB 176 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2017
    Prestigious Properties Inc v. Cold Lake Estates Inc 2016 ABQB 632 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Rein v. Alberta (Human Rights Commission) 2016 ABQB 386 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Paradigm Quest Inc v Mcleod 2015 ABQB 212 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2015
    Murphy v. Cahill 2014 ABQB 274 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    Murphy v. Cahill 2014 ABQB 62 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    Gauchier v Cunningham 2013 ABQB 713 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Tronchin (Re) 2013 ABQB 38 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Murphy v. Cahill 2013 ABQB 335 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 793 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 754 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 531 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 530 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 446 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Romspen Investment Corporation v. Hargate Properties Inc. 2012 ABQB 412 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Murphy v. Cahill 2012 ABQB 220 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Condominium Corporation No. 042 5636 v. Chevillard 2012 ABQB 131 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Chapman v. L'Hirondelle 2012 ABCA 25 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs
    Northern Development) v. Cunningham 2011 SCC 37 Supreme Court of Canada 2011
    Romspen Investment Corporation v Hargate Properties Inc., 2011 ABQB 759 (CanLII) 2011 ABQB 759 Alberta Queen's Bench 2011
    Peavine Metis Settlement v. Alberta (Energy) 2011 ABQB 472 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2011
    Condominium Corporation No. 0825873 v. 1246153 Alberta Ltd. 2011 ABQB 178 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2011
    Dancole Investments Ltd. v. House of Tools Company 2011 ABCA 145 Alberta Court of Appeal 2011
    Condominium Corporation No. 0825873 v. 1246153 Alberta Ltd. 2010 ABQB 718 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Suitel Canada Executive Suites Corporation 2010 ABQB 355 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Votour v. Tucker 2010 ABQB 34 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    E. Gruben's Transport Ltd. v. Alberta Surplus Sales Ltd. 2010 ABQB 244 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Wainwright (Town) v. 876947 Ontario Ltd. 2010 ABCA 23 Alberta Court of Appeal 2010
    Votour v. Tucker 2009 ABQB 722 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2009
    Bank of Montreal v. Valerio 2009 ABQB 578 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2009
    Laasch v. Turenne 2009 ABQB 267 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2009
    Saddleback v. Labine 2008 ABQB 698 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2008

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2008, Alberta
    2021, Northwest Territories
    Memberships

    Professional

    Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Creditor's Rights Section (North)
    Secretary
    2012 - Present

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    University of Alberta
    Class of 2002
    Bachelor of Arts

    University of Alberta
    Class of 2002
    with Honours

    McGill University
    Class of 2005
    Bachelor of Civil Law/Bachelor of Laws

Lindsey Miller

Partner at Field Law
Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NWEdmonton, AB T5J 0H3Canada

Show on map

Email Lindsey Miller

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions