×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawPartner
Jeremy Taylor

Jeremy Taylor

Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3

Corporate + Business Disputes, Insurance, Insurance Litigation - Defense and 3 more

About Jeremy Taylor

Jeremy Taylor is a lawyer practicing corporate + business disputes, insurance, insurance litigation - defense and 3 other areas of law. Jeremy received a degree from Simon Fraser University in 1998, and has been licensed for 24 years. Jeremy practices at Field Law in Edmonton, AB.

Jeremy Taylor (Edmonton, Alberta)

Reviews for Jeremy

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance
  • Law Enforcement
  • Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Corporate + Business Disputes
    • Insurance Litigation - Defense
    • Labour + Employment

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: KS v. Yakabuski 2017 ABQB 252 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2017
    Cole v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2016 ABLERB AP07 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2016
    Oatway v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2016 ABLERB 017 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2016
    Kikino Metis Settlement v. Husky Oil Operations Limited 2016 ABCA 228 Alberta Court of Appeal 2016
    Tyson v. Holloway 2016 ABQB 284 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Elkow v. Sana 2016 ABQB 235 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Lucic v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2016 ABLERB 10 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2016
    Elkow v. Sana 2016 ABQB 59 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Sobieh v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2016 ABLERB 4 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2016
    Elkow v. Sana 2015 ABQB 803 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2015
    Szpuniarski v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2015 ABLERB 27 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2015
    Oatway
    Cutknife v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2015 ABLERB 024 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2015
    Alberta Residential Corporation v Certain Lloyd's Underwriters 2015 ABCA 195 Alberta Court of Appeal 2015
    Monaghan v Edmonton (Police Service) 2015 ABLERB 7 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2015
    Buffalo Trail Public Schools Regional Division No. 29 v Alberta Teachers Association 2014 ABCA 407 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    James v Edmonton (Police Service) 2014 ABLERB 57 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2014
    DL v. Edmonton (Police Service) 2014 ABLERB 50 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2014
    Boychuk v Raymont 2014 CanLII 4511 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2014
    Arabi v Alberta 2014 ABQB 295 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    Samchuk v Anfred & Co. Inc. 2014 ABQB 17 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    McCallum v Edmonton (Police Service) 2014 ABLERB 17 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2014
    Boychuk v Edmonton (Police Service) 2014 ABCA 163 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    CH v Brodeur 2013 CanLII 69156 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2013
    McCallum v Vallee 2013 CanLII 60927 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2013
    Persaud v Hunter 2013 CanLII 48823 Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board 2013
    Meleshko v. Alberta 2013 ABQB 468 Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Alberta Teachers' Association v. Buffalo Trail Public Schools Regional Division 2013 ABQB 268 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Klychak v. Samchuk 2012 ABQB 85 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Meleshko v. Alberta 2012 ABQB 787 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Klychak v. Samchuk 2012 ABQB 584 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Klychak v. Samchuk 2012 ABQB 314 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Edmonton (Police Service) v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) 2012 ABCA 357 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Kindylides v. Korol 2012 ABCA 195 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Kindylides v. Korol 2012 ABCA 126 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Alberta Teachers Association v Buffalo Trail Public Schools Regional Division No 29 2013 ABQB 268 Alberta Grievance Arbitration 2011
    Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs
    Northern Development) v. Cunningham 2011 SCC 37 Supreme Court of Canada 2011
    Kindylides v. Edmonton (City) 2011 ABQB 756 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2011
    Calgary Board of Education
    ATA (Re) (2010), 103 C.L.A.S. 98 2010 CanLII 96482 Alberta Grievance Arbitration 2010
    Zukowski v. O'Bee 2010 ABQB 421 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Laprairie Group Contractors (Alberta) Ltd. v. Ledcor Alberta Limited 2009 ABQB 130 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2009
    Cunningham v. Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs
    Northern Development) 2009 ABCA 53 Alberta Court of Appeal 2009
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2008 FC 322 Federal Court (Trial Division) 2008
    Dhaliwal v. EPSB 2008 ABQB 429 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2008
    Cunningham v. Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs
    Northern Development) 2008 ABCA 83 Alberta Court of Appeal 2008
    Opal v. Boyd 2008 ABCA 25 Alberta Court of Appeal 2008
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2007 FC 768 Federal Court 2007
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2007 FC 657 Federal Court (Trial Division) 2007
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2007 FC 1054 Federal Court 2007
    Opal v. Boyd 2007 ABQB 373 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2007
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2006 FC 1218 Federal Court 2006
    Sawridge B
    v. Canada 2006 FC 1179 Federal Court 2006
    Besler v. Dillabough 2006 ABCA 232 Alberta Court of Appeal 2006
    Henson v. Champion Feed Services Ltd. 2005 ABQB 215 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2005
    Condominium Corp. No. 7921945 v. Cochrane 2004 ABPC 4 Provincial Court of Alberta 2004
    Schoff v. Royal Insurance 2004 ABCA 180 Alberta Court of Appeal 2004
    Henson v. Champion Feed Services Ltd. 2003 ABPC 204 Provincial Court of Alberta 2003

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, Alberta
    Memberships

    Professional

    Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Constitutional and Civil Liberties Law Section (North) Chair 2009 - 2014

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Simon Fraser University
    Class of 1998
    Bachelor of Arts

    University of British Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Juris Doctor

    Dalhousie University
    Class of 2006
    Master of Laws

Jeremy Taylor

Partner at Field Law
Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NWEdmonton, AB T5J 0H3Canada

Show on map

Email Jeremy Taylor

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions