Borden Ladner Gervais LLPPartner

Jeffrey Vallis, QC, FCIArb

About Jeffrey Vallis, QC, FCIArb

Jeffrey Vallis, QC, FCIArb is a lawyer practicing corporate commercial litigation and arbitration, oil and gas, product liability and 3 other areas of law. Jeffrey received a degree from Harvard Law School in 2011, and has been licensed for 44 years. Jeffrey practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Calgary, AB.

Awards

Reviews for Jeffrey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Natural Resources 1
    • Oil and Gas
  • Other 5
    • Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
    • Product Liability
    • Insurance and Tort Liability
    • Litigation and Arbitration
    • Construction and Engineering Contracts

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Recent arbitration work includes: Acting as counsel for two joint ventures engaged in disputes arising out of the design
    construction of a major ring road project in southern Alberta.
    Counsel for an international engineering firm defending a $125 million claim arising out of the design of a series of pumping stations on a large international oil pipeline. The arbitration was commenced as an ICC arbitration, but was converted to ad hoc rules by agreement between the parties.
    Counsel for an owner of a $1 billion sour gas processing plant in northern Canada claiming damages against two contractors
    a fabricator. This arbitration was commenced under UNCITRAL rules,
    is a multi-party proceeding.
    Counsel for a general contractor involved in disputes with the owner
    with a number of subcontractors arising out of the construction of an international airport in a major city in Canada.
    Counsel for a design build contractor, arising out of the design
    construction of a highway infrastructure project in southern Manitoba.
    Counsel for an EPC contractor involved in a dispute with the owner
    operator of a carbon capture facility.
    Sample of reported decisions: Whissell Contracting Ltd. v. Calgary (City) et al. (2017), ABQB 644
    successfully acted for a general contractor in resisting an application for summary judgment by a subcontractor.
    JTI v. Alberta (2016), ABCA 28 (Alta. CA)
    successfully set aside an adverse interpretation of the Tobacco Tax Act of Alberta.
    Tulsa Heaters Inc. v. Syncrude Canada Limited (2009), 86 CLR (3d) 245 (Alta. CA)
    upheld trial decision relating to changes in specifications.
    Tulsa Heaters Inc. v. Syncrude Canada Limited (2008), 2 Alta L.R. (5th) 296 (Alta. QB)
    successfully prosecuted claim arising out of changes to piping specifications in heavy oil upgrader project.
    Agrium Inc. v. Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada (2007), 5 WWR 530 (Alta. QB)
    successfully defended at trial a large claim against a fidelity bond.
    Graham Construction
    Engineering (1985) Ltd. v. LaCaille Developments Inc. (2006), 154 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1079 (Alta. QB)
    six-week trial dealing with delay claims, allegations of deficiencies,
    changes in scope of work.
    NAC Constructors Ltd. v. Alberta Capital Region Wastewater Commission (2005), 144 A.C.W.S. (3d) 469 (Alta. CA)
    upheld decision limiting effect of discretion clauses in tender documents.
    Westco Storage Ltd. v. BICC Canada Inc. (2005), 192 Man. R. (2d) 166 (CA)
    upheld summary dismissal of environmental claim based on Manitoba limitations legislation.
    Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex et al. (2002), 212 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (SCC)
    acted for intervenor in successfully challenging BCAA interpretation of Radio Communications Act.
    Canada Post v. Goodfellas Delivery Inc. (2002), 322 A.R. 13 (QB)
    application to strike portions of a defence.
    WIC Premium Television Ltd. v. General Instrument Corp. et al (2001), 2 WWR 431 (Alta. CA)
    leading decision on the jurisdiction of the Alberta courts.
    IMC Canada Ltd. v. Enron Canada Corp. (2001), 318 A.R. 62 (QB)
    application for interlocutory injunction.
    National Bank of Canada v. Merit Energy Ltd. (2001), 294 A.R. 36 (QB)
    determination of rights in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1982, Alberta
    2015, Manitoba
    2016, Saskatchewan
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Fellow, Canadian College of Construction Lawyers
    •Fellow, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
    •Member, Western Canada Commercial Arbitration Society
    •Member, Canadian Bar Association and Calgary Bar Association

    Community Involvement

    •Board Chair, Hospice Calgary Society, 2008-10
    •Director, Hospice Calgary Society, 2002-11
    •Trustee and Vice-President, Canadian Athletic Foundation, 1993-2010
    •Director and Vice-Chair, Recreation for Life Foundation, 2002-09
    •Co-Chair, Hospice Calgary's Community Campaign, 2008-09
    •University of Calgary Law Faculty Fundraising Campaign, 1999

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Toronto
    Class of 1981
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    Harvard Law School
    Class of 2011
    Executive Program

    Harvard Law School
    Class of 2011
    Leadership in Law Firms Certificate

Jeffrey Vallis, QC, FCIArb

Partner at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

Centennial Place, East Tower1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W.Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4Canada

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: