×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPPartner
Frank Tosto

Frank Tosto

Not yet reviewed

1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4

Intellectual Property Litigation, Trademarks, Copyright and 5 more

About Frank Tosto

Frank Tosto is a lawyer practicing intellectual property litigation, trademarks, copyright and 5 other areas of law. Frank received a degree from Intellectual Property Law Institute in 1993, and has been licensed for 29 years. Frank practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Calgary, AB.

Frank Tosto (Calgary, Alberta)

Reviews for Frank

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trademarks
  • Other 7
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Copyright
    • Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
    • Defamation and Media Law
    • Defence and Security
    • Autonomous Vehicles
    • Appellate Advocacy

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Represented both plaintiffs
    defendants in Bet-the-Company patent
    trade secret litigation concerning well-servicing equipment.
    Obtained an Order striking the Statement of Claim in a patent infringement computer software case concerning drones which service the defence industry.
    Represented corporation in a trademark dispute concerning a national advertising campaign.
    Represented US Corporation in trademark
    passing-off dispute permitting company to enter the Canadian marketplace.
    Obtained copyright protection for marine seismic data.
    Litigated case which determined the test for authorship of computer software programs in Canada.
    Obtained an ex parte interlocutory injunction requiring any
    all persons or other legal entities appearing to be in control of client's domain name, website
    email hosting account
    a company's social media accounts (including but not limited to, its Twitter
    LinkedIn accounts) to allow the client to change the username
    passwords without the rogue's authorization.
    Obtained an ex parte injunction shutting down a foreign website.
    Conducted an 18-month trial concerning defective cement
    associated insurance coverage issues.
    Represented insurers in significant directors' matter including third-party liability
    insurance coverage issues.
    Represented private school in high-profile Fatality Inquiries Act matter.
    Represented radiological technician in medical malpractice matter.
    Represented defendants in litigation concerning the medication Ephedrine.
    Represented both plaintiffs
    defendants in high-profile defamation law suits.
    Represented defendant concerning the electrical remediation of a high-rise building.
    Conducted several procurement matters including an arbitration under the New West Partnership Trade Agreement.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, Ontario
    2004, Alberta
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Member, Law Society of Upper Canada
    •Member, Law Society of Alberta
    •Member, Canadian Bar Association
    •Associate, Intellectual Property Institute of Canada (IPIC)
    •Insurance Committee Member, IPIC

    Community Involvement

    •Secretary, Calgary Elks Lodge & Golf Club

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Detroit
    Class of 1993
    J.D.

    University of Windsor
    Class of 1993
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    Intellectual Property Law Institute
    Class of 1993

Frank Tosto

Partner at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

Centennial Place, East Tower1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W.Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4Canada

Email Frank Tosto

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions