×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPSenior Associate
Locklyn E. Price

Locklyn E. Price

Not yet reviewed

1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4

Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration, Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Restructuring, Construction and 1 more

About Locklyn E. Price

Locklyn E. Price is a lawyer practicing corporate commercial litigation and arbitration, bankruptcy, insolvency and restructuring, construction and 1 other area of law. Locklyn E. received a B.A. degree from University of Calgary in 2009, and has been licensed for 13 years. Locklyn E. practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Calgary, AB.

Locklyn E. Price (Calgary, Alberta)

Reviews for Locklyn E.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Restructuring
    • Construction
    • Autonomous Vehicles

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Associate
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: 1285592 Alberta Ltd.v Moderno Homes Inc, 2018 ABQB 23
    Picturesque L
    scaping Inc v Moderno Homes Inc, 2018 ABQB 005
    ATM Cash Systems (Canada) Ltd v Vanshaw Enterprises Ltd, 2017 ABQB 622
    Wilderdijk-Streutker v Zhao, 2017 ABPC 24
    HSBC Bank Canada v Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd, 2017 ABCA 55
    Starr v Servus Credit Union Ltd, 2016 ABQB 300
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP v CBI Investments Ltd, 2016 ABQB 220
    HSBC Bank Canada v Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd, 2016 ABCA 117
    HSBC Bank Canada v Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd, 2016 ABCA 117
    ?HSBC Bank Canada v Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd, 2015 ABCA 399
    1773907 Alberta Ltd. v Davidson, 2015 ABQB 2
    Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd v Davidson, 2014 ABQB 218
    Silverado Oilfield Ventures Ltd v Davidson, 2015 ABQB 39
    1773907 Alberta Ltd v Davidson, 2015 ABCA 150
    Shelley Davidson, et al. v. 1773907 Alberta Ltd., 2015 SCC 81622
    Karn v The Queen, 2013 TCC 78
    Successfully negotiated a favourable resolution of a general contractual dispute, including a million dollar delay claim between a general contractor
    a Parks Canada bridge construction contract through mediation.
    Successfully obtained an award with respect a rental rate review arbitration.
    Successfully obtained judgment
    costs through arbitration for a construction client related to unpaid invoices
    successfully defended a significant counterclaim related to allegedly deficient work.
    Successfully applied for
    responded to numerous interlocutory applications.
    Successfully negotiated favourable resolutions of claims
    disputes for numerous clients at various stages of litigation.
    Successfully obtained certification of a Class Action Suit Against Bridgegate Financial Corporation.
    Successfully obtained a favourable award through arbitration for a client related to a Mutual Access Easement Agreement.?

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2013, Alberta
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Member, Canadian Bar Association
    •Member, Law Society of Alberta
    •Member, Calgary Bar Association

    Community Involvement

    •Volunteer, Provincial Court of Alberta - Civil Claims Duty Counsel
    •Volunteer, Children's legal & Educational Resource Centre (CLERC)
    •Volunteer Reader, BLG Reads to Kids Program (Calgary office)
    •Volunteer, Alberta Court of Queen's Bench Amicus Project

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    University of Calgary
    Class of 2009
    B.A.
    Philosophy

    University of Calgary
    Class of 2009
    B.A.
    with distinction

    University of Calgary
    Class of 2012
    Juris Doctor

Locklyn E. Price

Senior Associate at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

Centennial Place, East Tower1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W.Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4Canada

Email Locklyn E. Price

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions