×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPCounsel
Churyl Elgart

Churyl Elgart

Not yet reviewed

1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4

Municipal Planning, Municipal Liability, Land Development and 3 more

About Churyl Elgart

Churyl Elgart is a lawyer practicing municipal planning, municipal liability, land development and 3 other areas of law. Churyl received a B.A. degree from University of Alberta in 1994, and has been licensed for 26 years. Churyl practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Calgary, AB.

Churyl Elgart (Calgary, Alberta)

Reviews for Churyl

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Other 5
    • Municipal Planning
    • Municipal Liability
    • Land Development
    • Expropriation
    • Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Counsel
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Reported Municipal
    Planning Decisions: SDAB2017-0109 (Re), 2017 CGYSDAB 109 (condominium building)
    SDAB2017-0067 (Re), 2017 CGYSDAB 67 (daycare)
    SDAB2017-0039 (Re), 2017 CGYSDAB 39 (bottle depot)
    March v Evans, 2017 ABQB 200 (restrictive covenant)
    SDAB2016-0037 (Re), 2016 CGYSDAB 37 (residence)
    SDAB2016-0030 (Re), 2016 CGYSDAB 30 (residence)
    SDAB2015-0142 (Re), 2015 CGYSDAB 142 (Calgary Drop-In & Rehab Centre Society Centre 4800 development permit)
    SDAB2015-0004 (Re), 2016 CGYSDAB 4 (retaining wall)
    SDAB2015-0160 (Re), 2015 CGYSDAB 160 (residence)
    SDAB2015-0044 (Re), 2015 CGYSDAB 44 (retaining wall)
    SDAB2015-0012 (Re), 2015 CGYSDAB 12 (daycare)
    SDAB2014-0121 (Re), 2014 CGYSDAB 121 (residence)
    SDAB2014-0100 (Re), 2014 CGYSDAB 100 (digital sign)
    SDAB2014-0031 (Re), 2014 CGYSDAB 31 (residence)
    Maduke v. Leduc (County No. 25), 2010 ABCA 331
    Maduke v. Leduc (County No. 25), 2009 ABCA 382
    Fatality Inquiry: Report to the Attorney General - Public Fatality Inquiry into the death of Kevan John Ch
    ler, December 29, 2008 (Docken & Company)
    Expropriations: Churyl has been involved on various infrastructure projects across Alberta, including: West LRT (Calgary)
    Green Line LRT (Calgary)
    Sports
    Entertainment Complex (Fort McMurray)
    Southeast Valley Line LRT (Edmonton)
    17th Avenue SE Bus Rapid Transit (Calgary)
    Metis Trail Widening (Calgary)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2000, Ontario
    2003, British Columbia
    2004, Alberta
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    • Member, Law Society of Alberta
    • Member, Calgary Bar Association
    • Member, CREW Network (Commercial Real Estate Women)
    • Alberta Expropriation Association, 2018 President, 2016 and 2017 Vice-President (South), 2015 Auditor
    • Secretary, Municipal Section (South), Alberta Branch, Canadian Bar Association, 2013-present
    • Member, Commercial Real Estate Section (South), Alberta Branch, Canadian Bar Association
    • Co-Chair, Alberta Municipal Legal Advisors Conference, 2017
    • Member, Congress for the New Urbanism, 2015-present
    • Member, Urban Land Institute, 2016-present
    • Volunteer, Legal Education Society of Alberta, CPLED

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Alberta
    Class of 1998
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    University of Alberta
    Class of 1994
    B.A.
    Honors English

    University of Alberta
    Class of 1994
    B.A.
    first class honors

Churyl Elgart

Counsel at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Not yet reviewed

Centennial Place, East Tower1900, 520 - 3rd Avenue S.W.Calgary, AB M5H 3Y4Canada

Email Churyl Elgart

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions