×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
W. Stephen Rodgers
Pro

W. Stephen Rodgers

5.0
1 review

4444 Carter Creek Parkway, Suite 208, P.O. Box 4884, Bryan, TX 77805-4884

Trials and Appeals, Commercial Insurance Litigation, Personal Injury and 3 more

About W. Stephen Rodgers

W. Stephen Rodgers practices at Rodgers, Miller, Rodriguez & Fusco, P.C.

Read Full Bio

W. Stephen Rodgers (Bryan, Texas) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

W. Stephen Rodgers got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for W. Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Natural Resources 1
    • Oil and Gas
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Trials and Appeals
    • Commercial Insurance Litigation
    • Probate Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Rodgers, Miller, Rodriguez & Fusco, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Alongi v. Mostellar,
    2011 WL 2937470 (Tex.App.-Waco, 2011 no pet.)
    Bluebonnet Petroleum, Inc. v. Kolkhorst Petroleum Co., Inc.,
    2008 WL 2744282 (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2008 - pet. den'd)
    Shannon v. Barbee,
    2008 WL 802266 (Tex.App.-Waco, 2006 - pet. den'd)
    Imperial Lofts, Inc. v. Imperial Woodworks, Inc.,
    No. 10-06-00126-CV (Tex.App.- Waco, 2006, pet. den'd.)
    Dennis v. College Station Hosp., L.P.,
    169 S.W.3d 282, (Tex.App.-Waco, 2005, pet. den'd.)
    Daftarian v. S.B. ex rel. W.M.,
    2004 WL 2801582, (Tex.App.-Waco, 2004, appeal dism'd.)
    In re Dennis,
    2004 WL 2474424, (Tex.App.-Waco,2004, orig. proceeding)
    Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. v. W.L. Ranch, Inc.,
    127 S.W.3d 900, (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 2004, pet. den'd.)
    Monsanto Co. v. Davis,
    110 S.W.3d 28, (Tex.App.-Waco, 2002, no pet.)
    Heard v. Moore,
    101 S.W.3d 726, (Tex.App.-Texarkana, 2003, pet. den'd.)
    Monsanto Co. v. Davis,
    97 S.W.3d 642, (Tex.App.-Waco, 2002, pet. den'd.)
    Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. v. Neinast,
    67 S.W.3d 275, (Tex.App.-Hous. [1st Dist.], 2001, no pet.)
    Monsanto Co. v. Davis,
    25 S.W.3d 773, (Tex.App.-Waco, 2000, no pet.)
    In re Monsanto Co.,
    998 S.W.2d 917, (Tex.App.-Waco, 1999, no pet.)
    Monroe v. Blackmon,
    946 S.W.2d 533, (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 1997, orig. proceeding)
    In re Union Pacific Resources Co.,
    969 S.W.2d 427 (Tex. 1998)
    Rhodes v. Batilla,
    848 S.W.2d 833, (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.], 1993, writ granted
    w/drawn
    writ den'd)
    Loehr v Kincannon,
    834 S.W.2d 445, (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.], 1992, no writ)
    Clarke v. Ruffino,
    819 S.W.2d 947, (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.], 1991, writ dismissed w.o.j)
    Lehtonen v. Clarke,
    784 S.W.2d 945, (Tex.App.-Houston. [14th Dist.], 1990, writ den'd)
    Keller v. Davis,
    694 SW2d 355 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.]1985, writ ref'd n.r.e)
    Whitt v. Whitt,
    684 S.W.2d 731 (Tex.App. Houston 14th Dist. 1984, no writ)
  • Pro Bono Services
    Time Spent on Pro Bono Work: 10%
  • Additional Links
    http://www.rodgersmiller.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1979, Texas
    1979, U.S. District Court, Western and Southern Districts of Texas and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Memberships
    Brazos County (President, 1990-1991) and American (Member, Section on Litigation) Bar Associations
    State Bar of Texas (Member, Committees on: Funding of the Judiciary, 1986-1989
    Administration of Justice, 1990-1992
    Chairman, District 8 Grievance Committee, 1992-1995)
    Texas Young Lawyers Association (Director, 1982-1984
    Chairman: Courthouse Efficiency Committee, 1982-1984
    Legislative Committee, 1983-1986)
    American Board of Trial Advocates.
    Bar Fellowship
    Texas Bar Foundation (Life Fellow).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Texas Tech University
    Class of 1978
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Texas Tech University
    Class of 1975
    B.A.
    Legal Certifications
    Board Certified, Civil Trial Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1952
    Amarillo, Texas, December 21, 1952

Contact W. Stephen Rodgers

Partner at Rodgers, Miller, Rodriguez & Fusco, P.C.
5.0
1 review

4444 Carter Creek Parkway, Suite 208P.O. Box 4884Bryan, TX 77805-4884U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email W. Stephen Rodgers

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, W. Stephen Rodgers has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    W. Stephen Rodgers attended Texas Tech University.
  • Does this attorney maintain any other responsibilities in the firm outside of legal work?
    W. Stephen Rodgers is the Managing Partner of the firm.
  • How much pro bono work does this attorney do?
    W. Stephen Rodgers spends 10% of their time working pro bono.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Rodgers, Miller, Rodriguez & Fusco, P.C. was established in 1979.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions