×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.Member
no photo

Kongsik Kim

Not yet reviewed

Boston, MA, U.S.A.

Patent Procurement, Post-Grant Proceedings, IP Litigation and 13 more

About Kongsik Kim

Kongsik Kim is a lawyer practicing patent procurement, post-grant proceedings, ip litigation and 13 other areas of law. Kongsik received a B.S. degree from Seoul National University, and has been licensed for 20 years. Kongsik practices at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. in Boston, MA.

Kongsik Kim (Boston, Massachusetts)

Reviews for Kongsik

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Health Care
  • Other 14
    • Patent Procurement
    • Post-Grant Proceedings
    • IP Litigation
    • Joint Ventures, Strategic Alliances, Collaborations & Technology Transfer
    • Technology & Royalty Acquisition
    • Valuation & Assessment
    • Trademark, Copyright & Domain Name Protection
    • International Patent
    • Manufacturing
    • Energy Technology
    • Medical Technology
    • Life Sciences
    • Retail & Consumer Products
    • Technology, Communications & Media

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Korean
    Japanese
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Representing an energy storage manufacturer in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of California
    Representing a biotechnology company in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of California
    Representing a pharmaceutical company in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit in the District of Delaware
    Defending a medical image processing device manufacturer in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of California
    Representing an automated cell counting device manufacturer in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Virginia
    Northern District of California
    Defending an LED lightings manufacturer, a global vehicle manufacturer, a global vehicle parts manufacturer, a global bed manufacturer, an in-vivo imaging device manufacturer, an OLED device manufacturer,
    a touch-screen display manufacturer in various pre-lawsuit disputes
    Representing start-up pharmaceutical companies in negotiating with investors
    business partners
    Representing a global vehicle manufacturer in building defensive patent portfolio
    Representing a global wireless communication company in building offensive patent portfolio

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Massachusetts
    2007, New York
    Korean Intellectual Property Office
    Korean Patent Court
    United States Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement
    •Vice-Chair, Korea Committee of AIPPI-US
    •Executive Director, Korean American Bio Industry Council
    •Director, World Federation of Overseas Korean Traders Association, Boston
    •Member, Korean Patent Attorney Association
    •Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of New Hampshire
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Seoul National University
    B.S.
    Food Biotechnology

    Seoul National University
    B.S.
    cum laude

    Seoul National University
    B.S.
    Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology

    Seoul National University
    M.Eng.
    Food Biotechnology

    Seoul National University
    M.Eng.
    cum laude

    Seoul National University
    M.Eng.
    Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1969
    Seoul, South Korea, September 15, 1969

Email Kongsik Kim

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions