×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Conn Kavanaugh Rosenthal Peisch & Ford, LLPAssociate
Daniel Walsh-Rogalski
Pro

Daniel Walsh-Rogalski

Not yet reviewed

One Federal Street, 15th Floor, Boston, MA 02110

Business Litigation, Employment Litigation / Counseling and Land Use / Real Estate Litigation

About Daniel Walsh-Rogalski

Daniel is an associate in the firm’s litigation practice, working on a broad range of civil matters.

Daniel is a product of Boston education, graduating magna cum laude from the University of Massachusetts at Boston and completing his J.D. at Suffolk University Law School.

Daniel started as Conn Kavanaugh’s first ever law student intern and then participated in the firm’s Summer Associate program. During law school, he also served as a judicial intern to the Honorable Garrett J. McManus of the Suffolk County Juvenile Court and was a Senior Editor of the Suffolk Transnational Law Review.

Prior to law school, Daniel gained experience in a variety of fields, working in tech, politics, and marine manufacturing. Outside of the office, he enjoys playing tennis and is a die-hard Celtics fan. Daniel is also an active member of the Asian American Lawyers Association of Massachusetts.

Articles & Publications

• Author, “Improper Coaching in Remote Depositions,” October 2023

 

Daniel Walsh-Rogalski (Boston, Massachusetts) View website

Reviews for Daniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Employment Litigation / Counseling
    • Land Use / Real Estate Litigation

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2023, Massachusetts
    2024, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Suffolk University Law School
    Class of 2023
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Massachusetts
    Class of 2017
    B.A.
    Political Science, magna cum laude

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Daniel Walsh-Rogalski

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Daniel Walsh-Rogalski was admitted in 2023 to the State of Massachusetts.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Daniel Walsh-Rogalski is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Conn Kavanaugh Rosenthal Peisch & Ford, LLP has 47 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Daniel Walsh-Rogalski attended Suffolk University Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Conn Kavanaugh Rosenthal Peisch & Ford, LLP was established in 1988.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions