Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.Associate

no photo

About Daniel B. Weinger

Daniel B. Weinger is a lawyer practicing ip litigation, intellectual property, valuation & assessment and 3 other areas of law. Daniel received a degree from Boston College in 2011, and has been licensed for 15 years. Daniel practices at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. in Boston, MA.

Reviews for Daniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 5
    • IP Litigation
    • Valuation & Assessment
    • Technology
    • Communications & Media
    • Construction / Development

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Hebrew
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: International Trade Commission
    Certain Communications or Computing Devices
    Components Thereof (337-TA-925) Represented owner of portfolio of communications
    computing patents from former enterprise communications business unit of large multinational innovation company. Investigation was instituted in August 2014 as to respondent entities Apple, Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics
    HTC Corporation. Google participated as an intervenor. The investigation resolved prior to evidentiary hearing.
    Certain Consumer Electronics with Display
    Processing Capabilities (337-TA-884) Represented investors in the patent portfolio of the original Silicon Graphics, now known as Graphics Properties Holdings, as complainant in the International Trade Commission. Investigation was instituted in June 2013
    among the respondent entities were Panasonic, Toshiba, Vizio,
    ZTE. Most respondents settled. The ITC hearing was held over several days in May 2014,
    on August 29, 2014 Mintz Levin successfully obtained a recommendation for a Limited Exclusion Order against the remaining respondent, which chose to settle while Commission review of the Administrative Law Judge's was pending.
    Certain Consumer Electronics
    Display Devices
    Products Containing Same (337-TA-836) Represented investors in the patent portfolio of the former Silicon Graphics as complainant in the ITC,
    as plaintiff in multiple parallel District of Delaware cases. Cases were filed between late 2011
    early 2012,
    all were resolved by the end of January 2013. The technology at issue relates to LCD panels, central processor units, graphics processing units,
    other microprocessor technology. Successfully licensed all respondents, including some of the largest
    most recognized names in the converged device space - Apple, LG, Research in Motion, Samsung,
    Sony.
    Certain Portable Communication Devices (337-TA-827) Represented complainant in the ITC
    as plaintiff in multiple parallel District of Delaware cases. Successfully licensed all respondents, including some of the largest
    most recognized names in the converged device space - Amazon, LG, Motorola, Pantech Wireless, Research in Motion, Sony,
    more. Cases were filed in December 2011
    settled in May 2012.
    Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices
    Components Thereof (337-TA-804) Represented California-based complainant (plaintiff)
    its UK parent, companies that make LED lighting systems for use in film
    TV production, at the International Trade Commission. The ITC h
    ed down its Final Initial Determination of infringement on September 7, 2012. On January 17, 2013, the ITC issued a General Exclusion Order (GEO) against respondents (defendants) based in both China
    the United States. The result in this case is particularly notable because it is rare for the ITC to issue a GEO. It is much more common for complainants to seek
    receive a Limited Exclusion Order from the court due to the rigorous criteria
    careful balancing of interests that apply to requests for GEOs.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    First Circuit Court of Appeals
    United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    United States Patent and Trademark Office
    US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    2011, Massachusetts
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement
    • Member, Board of Trustees, Ben Franklin Institute of Technology

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Boston College
    Class of 2011
    JD

    New York University
    Class of 2006
    BA

    New York University
    Class of 2006
    Computer Science

Daniel B. Weinger

Associate at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

One Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111U.S.A.

Lawyers Nearby

J. Nathan Cole
Pro
J. Nathan Cole
4.9
General Practice lawyer
David F. Hassett
Pro
David F. Hassett
4.9
General Practice lawyer
Andrew DiCarlo Berman
Pro
Andrew DiCarlo Berman
3.7
General Practice lawyer
David E. Maglio
Pro
David E. Maglio
4.3
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Robert A. Sherman
Pro
Robert A. Sherman
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: