×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Givens Pursley LLPPartner
Mr. Michael Charles Creamer

Mr. Michael Charles Creamer

Not yet reviewed

601 W. Bannock Street, P.O. Box 2720, Boise, ID 83702

Land Use & Zoning, Environmental Law, Water Law and 6 more

About Mr. Michael Charles Creamer

Mr. Michael Charles Creamer is a lawyer practicing land use & zoning, environmental law, water law and 6 other areas of law. Michael received a B.S. degree from Colorado State University in 1979, and has been licensed for 37 years. Michael practices at Givens Pursley LLP in Boise, ID.

Mr. Michael Charles Creamer (Boise, Idaho)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Michael Charles Creamer got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Michael

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Environmental Law
  • Natural Resources 1
    • Water Law
  • Real Estate
  • Energy 1
    • Utility Law
  • Other 3
    • Land Use & Zoning
    • Public Lands
    • Telecommunications

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Givens Pursley LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Morgan v. Walter, 728 F. Supp 1483 (1990) (federal NEPA
    Clean Water Act claims)

    Fremont-Madison Irrig. Dist. v. Idaho Ground Water Appropriators, 129 Idaho 454, 926 P.2d 1301 (1996) (Snake River Basin Adjudication Basinwide Issue)

    State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, 130 Idaho 727, 947 P.2d 400 (1997) (Snake River Basin Adjudication Basinwide Issue)

    State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, 130 Idaho 736, 947 P.2d 409 (1997) (Snake River Basin Adjudication Basinwide Issue)

    A&B Irrig. Dist. v. Idaho Conservation League, 131 Idaho 411, 958 P.2d 568 (1997) (Snake River Basin Adjudication Basinwide Issue)

    Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Dept. of Water Resources, 135 Idaho 24, 13 P.3d 855 (2000) (water rights forfeiture, ab
    onment
    resumption of use)

    Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Dept. of Water Resources, 138 Idaho 831, 70 P.3d 669 (2003) (water rights forfeiture, ab
    onment
    resumption of use)

    American Falls Reserv. Dist. No. 2 v. Idaho Dept. of Water Resources, 154 P.3d 433 (2007) (conjunctive management of ground
    surface water rights)

    Building Contractors Ass'n of Southwest Idaho v. Idaho Public Utilities Comm'n, 151 Idaho 10, 253 P.3d 684 (2011) (challenging Idaho Public Utilities Commission decision on Idaho Power Company's line extension tariff)

    Brown v. Greenheart, 335 P.3d 1, 2014 (water rights as an appurtenance in real estate conveyances
    deed reformation).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Idaho
    2008, Wyoming
    U.S. District Court, District of Idaho
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    Idaho State Bar (Chair, Water Law Section, 1998-2000).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Colorado at Boulder
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Colorado State University
    Class of 1979
    B.S.
    Wildlife Biology

Email Mr. Michael Charles Creamer

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions