×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl

Not yet reviewed

2295 NW Corporate Blvd, Suite 117, Boca Raton, FL 33431

Securities Litigation, Securities Arbitration, Complex Commercial Litigation and 6 more

About Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl

Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl is a lawyer practicing securities litigation, securities arbitration, complex commercial litigation and 6 other areas of law. Carl received a B.B.A. degree from Florida Atlantic University in 1986, and has been licensed for 37 years. Carl practices at Palmer Law in Boca Raton, FL.

Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl (Boca Raton, Florida)

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Carl

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Mediation
  • Criminal Law
  • Other 6
    • Securities Litigation
    • Securities Arbitration
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • White Collar Criminal Defense
    • Broker-Dealer Enforcement
    • Regulatory Defense

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Managing Partner
    Firm Name
    Palmer Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Ubuy Holding, Inc. v. Gladstone, 340 F.Supp.2d 1343 (S.D.Fla. 2004)
    In re Sunstar Securities Healthcare Litigation, 173 F.Supp.2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2001)
    Smith v. Pennington, 325 F.3d 884 (4th Cir. 2003)
    SEC v. Yun, 327 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2003)
    SEC v. Yun, 208 F.3d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2002)
    SEC v. Yun, 148 F.3d 1287 (M.D. Fla. 2001)
    SEC v. Yun, 130 F.2d 1348 (M.D. Fla. 2001)
    Press v. Raether, 227 F.Supp.2d 1022 (E.D. Wis. 2002)
    Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P., 312 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2002)
    Cadle Co. v. G&G Associates, 757 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
    Cadle Co. v. G&G Associates, 741 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    Aquamar, S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc., 179 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 1999) (Represented the Republic of Ecuador)
    The Cadle Co. v. G & G Associates, 737 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    SEC v. Chapnick, {1993-1994 Transfer Binder} Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 98,076 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 11, 1994)(an insider trading
    $33 million securities fraud case)
    SEC v. Bradt {Current Transfer Binder} Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 98,624 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 1995)(a $27 million "Ponzi" scheme case)
    Travel Access, Inc. v. System One Direct Access, Inc., 696 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    Periera v. Florida Power & Light Company, 680 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    Williamson v. State, 681 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1996).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Florida
    1991, District of Columbia
    1996, New York
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Court of Military Appeals
    U.S. Tax Court
    U.S. District Court, Middle, Northern and Southern Districts of Florida including Trial Bar
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Nova University
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Florida Atlantic University
    Class of 1986
    B.B.A.
    with honors

    Oxford University School of Law, Oxford, England

    Emory University
    Class of 1990
    LL.M. in Litigation
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1964
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, April 28, 1964

Email Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl was admitted in 1989 to the State of Florida.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl is admitted to practice in District of Columbia, Florida and New York.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Palmer Law has 5 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mr. Carl Francis Schoeppl attended Nova University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Palmer Law was established in 1997.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions