Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLPPartner

Richard Matthew Barnes

About Richard Matthew Barnes

Richard Matthew Barnes is a lawyer practicing class action litigation, commercial and business tort litigation, general tort liability litigation and 5 other areas of law. Richard received a B.A. degree from Western Maryland College, and has been licensed for 45 years. Richard practices at Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP in Baltimore, MD.

Awards

Reviews for Richard

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability
  • Other 7
    • Class Action Litigation
    • Commercial and Business Tort Litigation
    • General Tort Liability Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation
    • Toxic Tort and Environmental Litigation
    • Litigation/Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: In 2018, Mr. Barnes
    Mr. Kohel prevailed in a product liability case for a Danaher subsidiary. After successfully excluding the plaintiff's expert during a Daubert hearing, the court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. In May 2018, Mr. Barnes
    Ms. Woolf obtained a verdict in the Northern District of Texas awarding their client multi-million dollars in damages in connection with the sale of pharmacy automation equipment. Mr. Barnes along with Ms Woolf
    Mr Kohel prevailed in a commercial arbitration tried in Chicago on behalf of Dentsply Sirona in December 2017, successfully enforcing a covenant not to compete against a former consultant. The team also defeated a counterclaim for royalty payments in connection with a proprietary manufacturing process.
    In June of 2017, Mr. Barnes
    Ms. Woolf obtained a preliminary injunction on behalf of a medical device client that enjoined a consultant
    former employer from competing. Also, in June 2017, he, Ms. Woolf,
    Mr. Stikeleather successfully defeated plaintiffs' motion for class certification in a decade-long class action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    In 2015, Mr. Barnes
    Ms. Woolf defeated a multi-million dollar claim for patent royalties based on various endodontic patents
    inventions. His client, Dentsply International, was also relieved of its obligation to pay future royalties on several of the disputed patents
    inventions. In December of 2013, Mr. Barnes
    Ms. Woolf successfully defended Dentsply International in a three-week California UCL class action trial in San Francisco Superior Court. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the win on appeal in January 2018. In 2013, he also successfully litigated a complex state procurement dispute before the Maryl
    Board of Contract Appeals on behalf of an institutional pharmacy. Mr. Barnes has also tried to verdict complicated multi-plaintiff product liability, pharmaceutical,
    medical device cases. He has briefed or argued cases before the United States Supreme Court
    various state
    federal appellate courts. He is currently serving as national counsel in two pharmaceutical litigations involving over-the-counter medications.
    Representative clients include Pfizer Inc, Wyeth, Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., Pacific Dunlop, Ltd., Dentsply Sirona, Danaher Corporation, Hill-Rom, Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Orthopedics, L. Perrigo Company, Nissan Motor Credit Corporation, Lafarge, ARINC, Vermont Talc, A.H. Robins Co., Gruss & Co., Correct Rx Pharmacy,
    several local businesses.
    Mr. Barnes' significant representations include trials for Pfizer Inc
    /or Wyeth relating to the Bjork Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve (1985-1999), Rezulin (2000-2004), the Howmedica Unicompartmental Knee (2001-2004), Diet Drugs (2003-2005),
    Neurontin (2007-2011).
    Mr. Barnes has represented Pfizer in the hormone therapy litigation in cases in several jurisdictions including Maryl
    , Pennsylvania, Minnesota, West Virginia,
    Virginia. He also had significant responsibilities for preparing
    presenting scientific evidence in the Celebrex, Bextra,
    Chantix Litigations. He has briefed
    argued several Daubert motions in pharmaceutical cases. Mr. Barnes served as national counsel to Pfizer
    its subsidiaries for claims
    disputes arising from the manufacture
    sale of the Duracon Unicompartmental Knee
    over-the-counter pain relievers. In addition, he obtained a temporary restraining order
    permanent injunction against the owner of a pornographic web site in Maryl
    for the infringement
    dilution of Pfizer's Viagra trademark.
    Mr. Barnes served on the firm's national counsel team representing Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. in connection with thous
    s of claims arising out of the alleged failure of pacemaker leads. In this role, he was responsible for defending two national class actions, coordination of the litigation in Canada, Australia,
    France,
    the presentation of scientific, engineering,
    regulatory evidence in various hearings for a class summary jury trial.
    Mr. Barnes represents L. Perrigo Company in cases in California, Maryl
    , Virginia, Pennsylvania, Indiana, New Jersey,
    the District of Columbia involving over-the-counter medications including aspirin (Reyes Syndrome), acetaminophen,
    ibuprofen.
    Mr. Barnes also represented ARINC, a provider of Advanced Information Management, for a rail control center in the matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Accident Cases in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. He was primarily responsible for preparing
    presenting technical
    scientific evidence pertaining to software design, train tracking algorithms, alarm management,
    accident reconstruction.
    Reported Cases: Class Action case
    Center City Periodontists, P.C. v. Dentsply International, Inc. , --- F.R.D. ----, 2017 WL 3142119 (E.D. Pa. July 24, 2017) Mr. Barnes was part of the Goodell team that, in 2017, successfully defeated a motion for class certification filed against the same dental device manufacturer in a decade-long class action in Pennsylvania federal court. The 36-page memor
    um opinion, which followed six days of hearings on the motion to certify, denied class certification on a multitude of bases. The district court judge found that the plaintiffs failed to meet three of the four requirements under Rule 23(a): typicality, adequacy,
    numerosity
    Rule 23(b)(3)'s requirements that common questions of law or fact predominate over individual questions
    that a class action is superior to other available methods for adjudicating the dispute. The court further agreed with Goodell's argument that the proposed class
    subclasses were not objectively ascertainable
    granted the Daubert motions to exclude the plaintiffs' economic damages
    FDA regulatory experts. In 2013, the team had obtained dismissal of claims for negligence
    alleged violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. That opinion, 2013 WL 3956284, is believed to be the first to hold that the NJCFA does not apply to the sale of prescription medical devices, which are not merch
    ise available to the public under the Act.
    United States Supreme Court case

    Morrison-Knudsen Constr. Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor , 461 U.S. 624 (1983)
    Federal Appellate Court cases

    Quillin v. C.B. Fleet Holding Co. 328 Fed. Appx. 195 (4th Cir. 2009)
    Zinser v. Accufix Research Inst., Inc. , 253 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001)
    273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001)
    In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. , 221 F.3d 870 (6th Cir. 2000)
    148 F. Supp. 2d 936 (S.D. Ohio 2001)
    137 F. Supp. 2d 985 (S.D. Ohio 2001)
    137 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (S.D. Ohio 2001)
    186 F.R.D. 459 (S.D. Ohio 1999)
    172 F.R.D. 271 (S.D. Ohio 1997)
    Bullard v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust , 74 F.3d 531 (4th Cir. 1996)
    845 F. Supp. 328 (D. Md. 1994)
    Hagepanos v. Shiley, Inc. , 846 F.2d 71 (4th Cir. 1988)
    Bonstingl v. Maryl
    Bank, N.A. , 841 F.2d 1122 (4th Cir. 1988)
    662 F. Supp. 882 (D. Md. 1987)
    Kontoulas v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc. , 745 F.2d 312 (4th Cir. 1984)
    Federal District Court cases

    Brodsky v. Ka Vo Dental Technologies, LLC
    Henry Schein, Inc., (D. Md. 2015)
    Brodsky v. KaVo Dental Technologies, LLC , 2018 WL 620453 (D,Md. Jan. 30, 2018)
    Center City Periodontists, P.C. v. Dentsply International, Inc. , 321 F.R.D. 193 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
    Johnson v. Dentsply Sirona Inc. , 2017 WL 4295420 (N.D. Okla. Sept. 27, 2017)
    Dentsply Sirona Inc. v. L I K Supply, Corp. , 2017 WL 4357462 (N.D. N.Y. Sep. 29, 2017)
    In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation , 900 F.Supp. 2d 926 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
    Dentsply International, Inc. v. Lewis
    Roca, LLP , 2013 WL 12246644 (D.N.M. Sep. 19, 2013)
    Introsan Dental Products, Inc. v. Dentsply Tulsa Dental, LLC , 2012 WL 3011830 (D.Md. July 20, 2012)
    Keffer v. Wyeth , 791 F.Supp. 2d 539 (S.D. W.Va. 2011)
    King v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. , 2011 WL 3157305 (D.Md. July 25, 2011)
    Hines v. Wyeth , 2011 WL 2792436 (S.D. W.Va. July 14, 2011)
    2011 WL 2680834 (S.D. W.Va. July 8, 2011)
    2011 WL 2680814 (S.D. W.Va. July 8, 2011), 2011 WL 2680842 (S.D. W.Va. July 8, 2011)
    In re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices
    Products Liability Litigation , 618 F. Supp. 2d 96 (D. Mass. 2009)
    Quillin v. C.B. Fleet Holding Co. , 2007 WL 3103903 (D. Md. Oct. 11, 2008)
    Moore v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories , 236 F. Supp. 2d 509 (D. Md. 2002)
    Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Capitol View II Ltd. P'ship Venture , 132 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.Md. 2001)
    L.M.P. Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co. , 128 F. Supp. 2d 287 (D. Md. 2000)
    116 F. Supp. 2d 645 (D.Md. 2000)
    Chertkov v. TPLC, Inc. , 916 F. Supp. 608 (N.D. Tex. 1996)
    In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Accufix Atrial J Lead Litig. , 168 F.R.D. 203 (S.D. Ohio 1996)
    164 F.R.D. 222 (S.D. Ohio 1995)
    Kemp v. Pfizer Inc , 851 F. Supp. 269 (E.D. Mich. 1994)
    152 F.R.D. 556 (E.D. Mich. 1993)
    Pfizer Inc v. FDA , 753 F. Supp. 171 (D.Md. 1990)
    EKA AB, Conteka B.V. v. Union Carbide Corp. , 699 F. Supp. 77 (D.Md. 1988)
    Pottratz v. Davis , 588 F. Supp. 949 (D.Md. 1984)
    In re Dalkon Shield Litig. , 599 F. Supp. 1351 (D.Md. 1984)
    581 F. Supp. 135 (D.Md. 1983)
    State Appellate Court cases

    Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply International, Inc. , 19 Cal. App. 5th 258 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)
    Volkman v. Hanover Investments, Inc. , 225 Md. App. 602 (2015)
    In re: West Virginia Rezulin Litig. , 585 S.E.2d 52 (W. Va. 2003)
    Moore v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. , 831 A.2d 12 (Md. 2003)
    Sterry v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. , 494 A.2d 748 (Md. App. 1985)
    Furr v. Spring Grove State Hosp. , 454 A.2d 414 (Md. App. 1983)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1981, Maryland
    1982, District of Columbia
    United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    United States District Court for the District of Maryland
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    United States Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional and Civic Associations

    •The Defense Research Institute
    •American Bar Association
    •Law Business Research: An International Who's Who of Product Liability Defense Lawyers
    •Maryland Defense Counsel, Inc.
    •Maryland State Bar Association (Committees on Budget & Finance and Pattern Jury Instructions, and Special Committee on Citizenship Law Related Education)
    •Bar Association of Baltimore City
    •District of Columbia Bar Association
    •Elder, Central Presbyterian Church (2001 - Present)
    •Board of Directors, Charlestown Retirement Community (2009 - Present)
    •Board of Trustees, Rodgers Forge United Methodist Church (1986 - 1998)
    •Treasurer: Dumbarton Middle School PTSA (1999 - 2000)
    •Towson Recreation Council, Girls Softball and Soccer Coach (1989 - 2004)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    cum laude

    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    1981 Editor

    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    American Criminal Law Review
    Other Education
    Western Maryland College
    B.A.
    Pi Gamma Mu

    Western Maryland College
    B.A.
    magna cum laude

    Western Maryland College
    B.A.
    1977 Honors: Omicron Delta Kappa
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1955
    Washington, D.C., 1955

Richard Matthew Barnes

Partner at Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP
Not yet reviewed

One South Street, 20th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202-3298U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
Pro
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Singleton Sinclair Mathews
Pro
Singleton Sinclair Mathews
4.2
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Liset Collazo-Dingle
Pro
Liset Collazo-Dingle
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
Pro
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Thomas Yost, Jr.
Pro
Thomas Yost, Jr.
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: