×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLPPartner
Mr. Kamil Ismail

Mr. Kamil Ismail

Not yet reviewed

One South Street, 20th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202-3298

Appellate, Product Liability, Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation and 6 more

About Mr. Kamil Ismail

Mr. Kamil Ismail is a lawyer practicing appellate, product liability, pharmaceutical and medical device litigation and 6 other areas of law. Kamil received a B.A. degree from Columbia University in 1982, and has been licensed for 33 years. Kamil practices at Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP in Baltimore, MD.

Mr. Kamil Ismail (Baltimore, Maryland)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Kamil Ismail got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Kamil

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance
  • Other 8
    • Appellate
    • Product Liability
    • Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation
    • Class Action Litigation
    • Commercial and Business Tort Litigation
    • Coverage
    • General Tort Liability Litigation
    • Lawsuits & Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Selected Cases
    Decisions: Wyoming Premium Farms, LLC v. Pfizer Inc, (D. Wyo. 2013). Granting Judgment on the pleadings based on federal preemption of state law claims relating to animal vaccines.
    Trice, Geary & Myers, LLC v. CAMICO Mut. Ins. Co., (4th Cir. 2011). Reversing summary judgment against client policyholder
    directing entry of partial summary judgment in its favor regarding duty to defend.
    Federal Ins. Co. v. Dentsply Int' l, Inc., (M.D.Pa. 2007). Upholding position of client policyholder that excess insurance was triggered after application of collective trigger
    single occurrence limit to underlying primary insurance coverage for multiple claims arising from product line failures.
    Pfizer Inc v. Stryker Corp., 348 F.Supp. 2d 131 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). Granting partial summary judgment entitling client manufacturer that divested specialty prosthetics business to multimillion-dollar indemnification from acquiring entity for post-divestiture products liability claims. (Of Counsel to Pfizer Inc)
    Arnold v. Intervet, Inc., 305 F.Supp.2d 548 (D.Md. 2003). Agreeing with client manufacturer of animal vaccines that plaintiffs' tort claims were probably preempted but rejecting federal question jurisdiction because federal regulation extinguished, not created, causes of action.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, Maryland
    1995, District of Columbia
    2003, United States Supreme Court
    United States District Court for the District of Maryland
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Maryland
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Maryland
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    1993 Order of the Coif

    University of Maryland
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    Executive Editor: Maryland Law Review
    Other Education
    Columbia University
    Class of 1982
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1958
    Ragama, Sri Lanka, April 3, 1958

Mr. Kamil Ismail

Partner at Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP
Not yet reviewed

One South Street, 20th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202-3298U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

James Taylor Heidelbach
Pro
James Taylor Heidelbach
4.4
2
Appellate Practice lawyer
443-909-4055
View Profile
David N. Kuryk
Pro
David N. Kuryk
4.5
5
Appellate Practice lawyer
667-407-3755
View Profile
Domenic R. Iamele
Pro
Domenic R. Iamele
5.0
2
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

443-909-4120
View Profile
Anton Louis Iamele
Pro
Anton Louis Iamele
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

443-909-4035
View Profile
Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
Pro
Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
5.0
6
Appellate Practice lawyer
443-909-4791
View Profile

Email Mr. Kamil Ismail

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions