×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. Charles Edward Rogers

Mr. Charles Edward Rogers

Not yet reviewed

245 Peachtree Center Avenue, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30303

Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Real Estate, Alternative Dispute Resolution and 2 more

About Mr. Charles Edward Rogers

Mr. Charles Edward Rogers is a lawyer practicing ethics & professional responsibility, real estate, alternative dispute resolution and 2 other areas of law. Charles received a B.A. degree from Duke University in 1989, and has been licensed for 33 years. Charles practices at Smith Currie Oles LLP in Atlanta, GA.

Mr. Charles Edward Rogers (Atlanta, Georgia)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Mr. Charles Edward Rogers got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Charles

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Construction Law
  • Government Contracts
  • Other 1
    • Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Smith Currie Oles LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters
    Equal Rights Center, et al., v. Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust, et al., v. Niles Bolton Associates, Inc., 602 F.3d 597 (4th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S.Ct. 504 (November, 2010) (In a case of first impression involving federal statutory preemption principles applied to the Fair Housing Act
    the Americans with Disabilities Act, obtained summary judgment on behalf of design firm on property owner's derivative claims seeking indemnification
    /or contribution for damages sustained through a settlement of claims alleging violations of FHA
    ADA design
    construction requirements at dozens of multi-family apartment projects).
    Kami Z. Barker
    Access Now, Inc. v. Emory University, et al., 316 Fed. Appx. 933 (11 Cir. 2009) (Defense verdict at jury trial on claims alleging violations of the FHA
    ADA at student housing apartments on university campus).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, Georgia
    1998, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
    1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    2000, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia
    2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    2010, United States Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    •State Bar of Georgia, Member
    •American Bar Association, Litigation Section and Forum on Construction Law
    •ABA Forum on Construction Law, Division 5 Steering Committee
    •Atlanta Bar Association, Litigation and Construction Law Sections

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Emory University
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Duke University
    Class of 1989
    B.A.

Mr. Charles Edward Rogers

Partner at Smith Currie Oles LLP
Not yet reviewed

2700 Marquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Avenue, N.E.Atlanta, GA 30303U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kevin S. Little
Pro
Kevin S. Little
4.9
49
Health Care lawyer
706-925-9929
View Profile
David James Brevda
Pro
David James Brevda
5.0
5
Health Care lawyer

Free Consultation

332-388-8092
View Profile
Jennifer Marie Smith
Pro
Jennifer Marie Smith
5.0
12
Health Care lawyer
470-575-9094
View Profile
Jennifer Fogel
Pro
Jennifer Fogel
5.0
1
Health Care lawyer

Free Consultation

469-915-6939
View Profile
Robert L. Goldstucker
Pro
Robert L. Goldstucker
5.0
1
Health Care lawyer
404-726-6676
View Profile

Email Mr. Charles Edward Rogers

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions