This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Avvo Client's Choice
This award is granted to attorneys with at least 5 reviews with 4+ stars in a given year on Avvo.com.
About Awards
Client Champion Awards
Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity
and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service.
Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.
At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.
At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.
At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale Peer Awards
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Avvo Awards
Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A,
publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.
Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.
Old case: This attorney allowed a faculty member At UGA to get away with relentlessly stalking and harass me at every level for over a period of 1.5 years. This faculty member worked in the bursars department. The faculty members consistently violated my first amendment rights and rights to be left alone under both Georgia law and constitution laws implemented throughout. Police were called on me repeatedly, sent to my home, sent to my classroom, and I was sent to judicial programs three times for making constitutionally protected statements not to contact me and leave me alone, my protected rights under both state and federal laws. The faculty members , who is a state government employee, violated my first amendment rights and state laws, consistently for 1.5 years. So much so that I was forced to leave UGA after being systematically bullied and stalked by this government official, relentlessly. When I tried to re-enter the university, my federal student loans kept being denied by the
If you would like a misogynistic, unreliable, unkind, crook of a divorce lawyer, Greg Daniels is your guy! I paid him thousands of dollars for him to treat me terribly and take a year to NOT finish my divorce. I had to hire a second lawyer. He made promises he did not keep, even the simplest of work. If you want to be billed for emails and phone calls that have no purpose, and you have to reply to get to the bottom of what he is asking (more time to read emails = more money for him), this is your guy. Ladies, BUYER BEWARE! He was so supportive during the consultation, but a totally different "man" once he has your money. There are so many more qualified and caring lawyers that are happy to work with you to get the job done.
Greg will do nothing on your behalf. He will make 100 promises and not deliver on a single one, even though being paid for every one. Greg will not do anything yo6 ask him like getting text messages that would immediately end the case, instead takes thousands out if trust to pay for actions not even performed, even 3 years later. Greg will even make a MASSIVE MISTAKE of comming after your children and person families possessions even though you hired him to DEFEND YOU! After calling Greg out on all his unethical actions and pure lies he quit the case and refuses to do anything after being paid THOUSANDS. Stay away from crooked unethical greg as he will shortly be a product of Ga Bar investigations.
By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls,
from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship
and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client.
The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.
Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page
Martindale Peer Reviews
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*
• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.